CRUCIAL LISTENING. Among the replies to this tweet was a link from @Bman78518518 to a great discussion of the obvious corruption that this JAMA paper points to. 1/8 https://twitter.com/NickHudsonCT/status/1347803080541286402

50:00 into this podcast and running for 8 minutes, @BretWeinstein and @HeatherEHeying deliver incisive criticism, highlighting the circular reasoning at work in the JAMA paper. 2/8 https://open.spotify.com/episode/4tBLwa4HLmeUj6p3ojB6tS?si=IHtFRYJ5Q2iY2mLgS8SVhA

The fact that the CDC is clutching at straws like this is crucial. Failure of the asymptomatic-transmission-as-driver theory would explain why so many studies fail to establish lockdown and mask mandate efficacy. 3/8 https://twitter.com/the_brumby/status/1349478824606502912?s=20

It is clear that the CDC is desperate to avoid this outcome. Why? If measures that manifestly cause great misery can be terminated without risk, the likely reason they'd behave like this is that they are deeply corrupt & serving interests other than those of the public. 4/8

As Fauci himself famously and emphatically opined, asymptomatic transmission is not expected to be important, so the theory that it is starts on shaky clinical grounds, as explained by Prof. Bela Stadler. 5/8

The @WHO segment of that last clip set off a similar instance of naked circular reasoning using models, as explored in this thread. 6/8 https://twitter.com/NickHudsonCT/status/1329811123256889347?s=20

So we have the CDC and the WHO shamefully desperate to prop up a false narrative that must be one of the most harmful ever concocted. Given the stakes, this calls for immediate investigation at the highest levels. Who will carry it out? 7/8

I'd appreciate it if Team Lockdown would refrain from replying to this thread with references to the notorious "post hoc ergo propter hoc" papers, such as Flaxman-Ferguson, which only serve to amplify this scandal. 8/8 https://twitter.com/SHomburg/status/1317126650946031617?s=20