Read on Twitter
Any discourse using @anarchopac latest video critiquing @EmericanJohnson as a way to sew more division within anarchist spaces through the framework of dunking or discrediting EJ's work and messaging are missing the point entirely
While I belive the title of Zoe's video is click baiting the overall "Hey EJ you interpreted theory wrong and here are the historical dangers and consequences" is a solid breakdown of the errors
I didn't agree how throughout the video it was framed as "EJ said marxist leninist so I'm defining it as stalinism and anarchists were murdered by those thoughts" I will say that when taken as a good faith critique her video highlights the dangers of redefining,
Misunderstanding and re-envisioning to fit a contemporary frame work. My criticism on Zoe is one she often levies against herself in that she focuses much to often on historical precedent which in my opinion stifles
any sort of progress for new synthesis when attempting to create our own contemporary ideas.
Tactical unity as a concept as defined from zoe in the video just isn't understood as that now.
Tactical unity as a concept as defined from zoe in the video just isn't understood as that now.
Offline activist groups with opposing tendencies under tactical unity like maoists and anarchist groups in the US might bicker and disagree will help each other with events and coordination same with the DSA and IWW
It's interpreted in definition tactical and unity. Coming together to achieve our common goals but ultimately seperating into our respective groups when our goals do not align any further with actions being taken
Taking this as an opportunity to shit on either one of these comrades for validation IS THE PROBLEM
