Important, potentially dangerous inaccuracies in piece from @davidshukmanbbc on @BBCNews discussing outdoor #COVID19 transmission

Firstly UV does help kill virus particles BUT the amount of UV in Northern Europe in January is unlikely to be enough for significant effect!

1/
2/

This is today's UV forecast from the Met Office

It's a sunny day and we hit a UV index of...

...drum roll...

ONE

🤦‍♀️

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/weather/uv-index-forecast/#?tab=map&map=MaxUVIndex&zoom=5&lon=-4.00&lat=55.71&fcTime=1610755200
3/

Secondly, relative humidity is a complex beast but often you will find that is high outdoors.

In the winter air can 'carry' less moisture before becoming saturated - this is why mist is more common outside of warmer hours and in the winter.
4/

Whilst less inaccurate than the claim on UV, I would suggest that broad assertions that virus particles will dehydrate rapidly outdoors are unsafe.

On a dry, sunny day - probably.

On a day when you can feel (or see!) moisture in the air, much less likely.
5/

No disagreement that transmission is less likely outdoors and I suspect that many, including @grahamja51 would support ventilation being a key mitigation against #COVID19 transmission...
6/

Recycling is often good for the planet, but recycling information at the wrong time can be harmful

Please @FactCheck @BBCNews - some material in your article (with foggy photo!) is better applied to the summer rather than the depths of winter

(end) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-55680305
You can follow @ConcernedofBri1.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.