It's like this:

A new med to treat flu enters FDA trials

Now imagine that med caused fatal anaphylaxis in a significant # of trial participants.

Then, imagine the FDA labeled those deaths "flu" & not only approved the med but used those deaths to justify the approval

Not good
The main reasons we do extensive clinical trials on new drugs are:

1. to ensure effectiveness
2. to ensure safety

We don't have that info for NPIs.

Yet, we are moving forward with the experiment, hurtling toward approval, w/ complete disregard for the deadly side effects...
What they do get right is that minorities and socioeconomically compromised people have borne the brunt of these non-COVID deaths.

And it's not difficult to understand why.

The effects of lockdowns are not evenly distributed.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417923/
We also know that the age-stratification of non-Covid excess deaths does not align with known age-dependent C19 mortality rates.

This suggests that those deaths were not, in fact, directly related to COVID-19.
We also know that in Dec, the CDC issues an alert on:

"a concerning acceleration of the increase in drug overdose deaths, w/ the largest increase recorded from March 2020 to May 2020, coinciding w/ the implementation of widespread mitigation measures..."
https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2020/han00438.asp
We do know NPIs are increasing excess mortality.

To suggest all excess deaths are "directly related" to C19 is misleading & erroneous.

Period.

Now, it's clear that there are a lot of egos & special interests invested--lots of ppl who don't want to have been wrong...
...especially not about supporting policies that may have killed more than 1/2 the number of ppl recorded as having died with the virus.

But priming the public to accept that all excess death is directly related C19 is an unacceptable & deadly double-down...
We are entitled to know the side effects & potential negative outcomes of the medicine we've been forced to swallow.

And this "all deaths = COVID" thinking is particularly perilous given that failure to account for harms from lockdowns/NPIs will result in future repeats...
So what's the fix?

--Transparency

--Good science

--Honest communication (including media)

And we're seeing very little of it.

Whether willful or otherwise--well-intentioned or poor--this kind of slanted narrative does far more harm than good.
You can follow @AJKayWriter.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.