Imagine you only detect 75% of true cases of infection. Well, you just cut the risk of transmission in school by 75% and that's not nothing. What about the remaining 25%? Use masks as well. Anything that makes it through the rapid test now has to beat the mask 2/n
Like I explain with @LeeKShaffer @baym in this (shortly in a journal near you) the perfect can be the enemy of the good. Let's think about reducing transmission enough through various interventions to get control 5/n https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/37363184?show=full
That paper 👆🏼 also incidentally considers the advantages of detecting *transmission* rather than cases, which is important for a thing that tends to spread in clusters, and can inform quarantine decisions 6/n
It is beyond bizarre is that this is in the UK, where until recently there was a parroting insistence that "schools are safe" instead of doing stuff to make them safe*er* 7/n
Testing (of all kinds) is an important part of that. One of the relative success stories of the last few months has been the way regular testing in colleges has restricted transmission in this age group https://www.bu.edu/healthway/community-dashboard/ 8/n
Making this work, of course, requires clear honest messaging from trusted sources. Plus a consistent goal to keep transmission low across the board, not high in some groups and low in others.

Yeah, I know.

9/end
You can follow @BillHanage.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.