A fear of books and a repellent personality are a pretty sad basis for a political worldview. https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/13/leftists-are-colonizing-red-towns-like-mine-and-local-republicans-are-clueless/#.YABcKoKaSF9.twitter
As an avowed believer in free speech, free enquiry, and open debate, I hate that libraries include books I find controversial
Identity politics is a distraction from serious issues, like how I have been victimized by the homeless
Kudos(?) for a piece that so concisely and thoroughly embodies the hatred, ignorance, victimhood, solipsism, and fear prized in current "conservative" commentary, while also being genuinely funny to read.
PS The author dwells on pet RW hates like DiAngelo and Kendi, and that's silly, but here are some other books he apparently doesn't think the library should be making available -- history, literature, memoir, academic studies. All of these threaten his fantasy. From his own link:
So, in sum, we have a screed here that complains about libraries carrying controversial books and decries the existence of liberals and conservatives in what is "supposed to be" a monochromatically Red space.
Who's in favor of censorship, safe spaces, and polarization, again?
Who's in favor of censorship, safe spaces, and polarization, again?