If you think deplatforming is just for demagogues & insurrectionists, let's have a little talk about how content moderation is everywhere

A few days ago, @LinkedIn banned @TeaLatvala & her business.

Her business makes and sells Finnish designed sex toys https://teatiamo.com/ 
Linked In said "this type of content was not allowed" and later locked her account.

Now, banning or deplatforming sex *workers* is nothing new. It deprives groups that are already marginalized of a way to make an income and puts them more at risk. https://twitter.com/TeaLatvala/status/1349317961966907393
But, because sex work is often criminalized (whether this should be so is a topic for another time), platforms banning out of compliance with the law is somewhat understandable.

But that's not what's happening here.
This is a legal product, not a criminalized service. And as far as functional definitions go a ban on a business that manufactures sex toys seems, at a functional definitional level, impossibly vague.

I mean. . . anything can be a sex toy if you try hard enough.
But what I really want to emphasize here is the power of these platforms over small businesses and the ability of individuals to earn a living.

This is no surprise to anyone whose channel has been banned from YouTube, or tries to work the gig economy, or is a sex worker.
What's a big deal here is it shows how much harm can happen to anyone running a legal business -- the loss in advertising, connections, supply chains, hiring -- and how little recourse there is to fix it if you're just an average person.

/fin
You can follow @Klonick.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.