On the face of it, most of these plans sound sensible, if ambitious. Though most have already been briefed out - beginning to feel like I'm in some kind of distraction story groundhog day... 🤔

But there are some potential dangers ahead:
1. Choice of location is crucial. In interviews, we heard similar things to the anonymous MP, particularly when it comes to policy jobs. And recall that HMT staff skew young.

Big cities also have a deeper skill base if you want to hire locally.
Worst case scenario is an ONS-style shedding of staff - when it moved its HQ to Newport, 90% left rather than follow it.
2. Clustering civil service jobs in the one location is another success factor. The govt shouldn't be shy about sending CS jobs to places that already have them - it can help with cross-dept collaboration and build decent career paths (and so helps attract talent).
3. Senior involvement is also critical to success - it shows the new office is a serious endeavour and helps with career paths, but has been a struggle in the past. Govt needs to spell out plans for how they will do things differently
I'm rather sceptical that ministers will spend a "significant" amount of time in regional offices - unless of course those happen to coincide with constituencies. (We heard in interviews that one dept had constructed a ministerial suite outside London that had never been used.)
Finally - for a really valuable historical perspective on all of this, worth your time reading this on the former Government Offices network by @oldtrotter: https://twitter.com/ukcivilservant/status/1334116607745024002?s=20
You can follow @sarahjnickson.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.