1/ $MRPH $UBT $MITx $VVT $VIDT

Tokens which have business models that correlate adoption with their token price are primed for sustained growth.

This thread will highlight how the above are fundamentally designed to moon through adoption.

2/ $MRPH

1% of transactions generated are converted to $MRPH and locked up for the shipment duration.

More adoption = more tokens locked up at any given time causing the price to rise through scarcity.

3/ $MITx

Subscriptions for the #MLSeed platform require the equivalent amount of tokens (to fiat costs) to be locked up for the subscription duration.

More users = more tokens locked up and increased buy pressure from the resulting demand/scarcity.

4/ $VVT

5% of advertising and 2.5% of subscription revenue is used to buyback $VVT from the market and make it deflationary.

This is done by splitting the purchase into 3 pools

- Permanently locked
- Staking rewards
- Ecosystem pool

The image below explains this further.

5/ $UBT

To use the Unibright platform the customer must own $UBT tokens and lock them within the platform.

Similar to $MITx and $MRPH this creates an element of scarcity as the user count of the platform increase, this as we know leads to an increase in token price.

6/ $VIDT

VIDT tokens are used for their validation service.

20% of this amount is burnt (deflationary).
10% of this is bought back from the market (demand).

This creates a deflationary environment where more clients lead to more buybacks and more burns.

7/ $MRPH $MITx $VVT $UBT $VIDT

What all these projects have in common is that their business models require their tokens and that their demand will correlate with adoption through the way their tokenomics are designed.