The problem with pastoral ministry is that it often selects for men who are both not very good leaders and conflict averse.
What I mean is:
Start out with early-20-something men who have an interest in theological studies.
That already is a very narrow pool, and already the overwhelming majority of them would be described as “bookish” if we are being unbelievably charitable.
Start out with early-20-something men who have an interest in theological studies.
That already is a very narrow pool, and already the overwhelming majority of them would be described as “bookish” if we are being unbelievably charitable.
Next:
Load them down with tens of thousands of dollars of debt for skills and a degree that limit their career prospects to a singular vocation and almost literally nothing else.
Load them down with tens of thousands of dollars of debt for skills and a degree that limit their career prospects to a singular vocation and almost literally nothing else.
You have built a man whose livelihood is EXTREMELY tenuous.
The consequence of this is he will ALWAYS take the path of least resistance.
Whatever squeaky wheels in your congregation, the Aymee-Burd-loving wine aunt, whomever he will SUBMIT to them.
The consequence of this is he will ALWAYS take the path of least resistance.
Whatever squeaky wheels in your congregation, the Aymee-Burd-loving wine aunt, whomever he will SUBMIT to them.
It isn’t just that the economics of that demand it weak, passive men.
It is also a career TAILOR-MADE for people-pleasers.
IN SHORT: If you have a pastor who could quit tomorrow and make the same or better money doing something else—and he knows it—thank the Lord.
It is also a career TAILOR-MADE for people-pleasers.
IN SHORT: If you have a pastor who could quit tomorrow and make the same or better money doing something else—and he knows it—thank the Lord.