Read on Twitter
1/ This will ruffle a few feathers, as it should. https://twitter.com/MichaelPSenger/status/1348324838167908352
2/ Let's remind ourselves of few basics: (1) Lockdowns were warned against by every relevant institution, including the WHO, whose last warning was refreshed as late as December 2019. (2) Since May, it has been nose-bleedingly obvious that Covid lockdowns produced no benefit.
3/ (3) Hard-pressed to say something in response to this lack of substance, three derisory papers have been produced and hustled through "peer review", but all made the same basic "rain dance" error. At least one of them was co-authored by a lockdown architect, Fergusson.
4/ Many more better papers found no effect or an adverse one, & some key ones have been denied publication, as they're inconvenient. Their results are not surprising, as this was expected by pre-Covid science. Slowing spread is a bad idea given profoundly age-graduated fatality.
5/ Conflicts of interest abound. There is scarcely a university department or government advisory group that does not suffer from every member being in some way tainted by pharma or tech largesse.
6/ But, yes, let's go with the CCP, bastion of creativity that they are. If you've gotten this far, please go back to the retweet in "/1", read the links, and think through the enormity of the fact that the world had been positioned to swallow their poison willingly. END
