1/12 Long thread, on censorship, China, USA, Liberal Democracy.
@BethanyAllenEbr from @Axios says Twitter bans is no comparison to that of
. As one spent her 1st 22yr in China, I argue the contrary. The situation in 
is worse than
@BaldingsWorld
https://twitter.com/BethanyAllenEbr/status/1348491758796238850
@BethanyAllenEbr from @Axios says Twitter bans is no comparison to that of




@BaldingsWorld

2/12 Bethany's main argument is Twitter is a private company, it has the "FREEDOM“ to ban Trump. In her argument, she uses
gov't official (incl. Xi) as comparison, i.e. she takes Trump's role as a gov't official. Wrong here.
gov't is different from
gov't.




3/12 The US has 3 branches, legislative, judicial, executive (headed by Trump).In today's
, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is above the law, legislative is a rubber stamp controlled by CCP, gov't is appointed by CCP. In CCP, the leader (一把手) is everything, he (Xi) is the God


4/12
Constitution says
is a 人民民主专政(People's Democratic DICTATORSHIP) country, a Socialism country and Communism is the final goal. This is in its Constitution, CCP never covered up or lied about this.



5/12 What is People's Democratic DICTATORSHIP? Briefly, if you are not with me, you are my enemy & you shall be either converted (this is all the Uighurs re-education camp about) or eliminated spiritually and physically (also Uighurs, or Falun Gongers) but
didn't lie, it's...


6/12 ... backed up by its Constitution, it's legitimate in the context of
legal system. That's why so many Chinese youths support the suppression of Uighurs or Falun Gongers. So don't use double standards to criticize
for that. Don't get me wrong, I'm NOT saying this is RIGHT



7/12 When idiots like
PM @JustinTrudeau says he admires
's basic dictatorship, he has no clue what dictatorship is. Basically, anyone (a lot of 
youths) who admires communism, whether
or
's, is b/c they never taste the Socialism "Iron Fist"(社会主义铁拳).







8/12 In that context of "People's Democratic DICTATORSHIP", censorship is legitimized in
. Media (social or traditional) self-censor to meet the gov't (NO, not gov't but CCP's) directives. Yes, the directives are obscure, and dynamic, but it is Constitutional


9/12 For the situation in
, let's replace Trump w/ Dan Bongio, or Parler. The Freedom of Speech is in the 1st Amendment of US Constitution. Many Trump supporters lost their jobs for supporting a legitimately elected President. Where are the Freedom of Speech for them?


10/12 Is Twitter a private company doing its censor alone? No. It's all Big Techs AND the Democratic Party hunting down & prosecuting Trump supporters (Cruz, Hawley, Parler, @thecjpearson etc),this is what Sheldon Wolin called "Inverted Totalitarianism"
https://twitter.com/NaomiWong1984/status/1348122840067817477

11/12 Has any Democrats or
Liberals been banned by Twitter for hating Trump or inciting violence? 
Democratic Party now has the legislative & executive branches. Will Twitter ban Biden (gov't official) for HB's criminal acts? No, Twitter only bans the news bad for Biden.


Democratic Party now has the legislative & executive branches. Will Twitter ban Biden (gov't official) for HB's criminal acts? No, Twitter only bans the news bad for Biden.

12/12 In conclusion, the situation in 
is worse than in
. Chinese can expect what is allowed, what is not.
Canadians/Americans just found out Freedom of Speech is a LIE.
Let me cite former CCP Jiang's quote: You guys (baizuo 白左) are "too simple, sometimes naïve". /end



Canadians/Americans just found out Freedom of Speech is a LIE.
Let me cite former CCP Jiang's quote: You guys (baizuo 白左) are "too simple, sometimes naïve". /end
13/12. Twitter did not allow me to include this GIF in the last tweet 12/12.
Here is the context of that quote.

https://www.quora.com/What-does-the-Chinese-saying-too-young-too-simple-sometimes-naive-mean?share=1
Here is the context of that quote.

https://www.quora.com/What-does-the-Chinese-saying-too-young-too-simple-sometimes-naive-mean?share=1
@threader_app compile