There's a lot of interest in the relationship between communication & violence right now, so I'm going to thread some things I've written that you can read if you want to learn more. >>
First, an open access essay on "dangerous demagogues" and "weaponized communication"--using language as force to intimidate. It's got some parts from my Trump book in it & examples of Trump, Alex Jones & white nationalists: https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/175471
I've written lots of other things & done other explainer videos & whatnot, but I'm sure that's enough to read! Trump is a dangerous demagogue, he always has been.
And, tl:dr: Trump uses three rhetorical strategies consistently to appeal to his base: ad populum, paralipsis, and American exceptionalism.
He uses three rhetorical strategies to separate him and his base from everyone else: ad hominem, ad baculum, and reification.
And he uses fascist appeals to create loyalty between him & his followers: https://twitter.com/jenmercieca/status/1208040204730273797
And people always ask me how to counter Trump's messages. The most democratic way is to show how they work so folks can decide for themselves (as I try to do).
In the fascism thread I suggest we "weirdify" what Trump makes simple. And here I try to simplify what Trump makes complex: https://twitter.com/jenmercieca/status/1347546507080314881
You can follow @jenmercieca.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.