The Democratic party has been selling out the American working class for decades.

I'm not talking about their ideology, that I tend to agree with, but the results of their actions when it meets the ambitions of Americans.

*AND* Trump is a Fascist tyrant.
What choice does the Democratic party leave us, other than vote for them, in order to remove a mob boss committing treason.

Are your problems caused by angry working-class Americans?

Or the people who have been buying government so they can own our lives?
while I'm sure Barack Obama didn't intend for Steve Mnuchin and Wilbur Ross steal people's homes, Kamala Harris declined to prosecute Steve mnuchin.

https://static.theintercept.com/amp/treasury-nominee-steve-mnuchins-bank-accused-of-widespread-misconduct-in-leaked-memo.html
"The corporate state is to Mussolini what the New Deal is to Roosevelt." -- Fortune Magazine (1934)

"Fascism is the open, terroristic dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinist and most imperialist elements of finance capital" -- Communist International
Which party doesn't meet that description?

Are the Democrats planning on bailing out the investors again, when Trump's disaster crashes the stock market?

Goldman Sachs will profit up and down.
We are Fascist.

We invaded Iraq on a lie, and Donald Trump extorted them, and then assassinted their ally in their capital.

We're still going to work. https://twitter.com/techstoa/status/1260184320632897536?s=20
It took a while before we let a mob boss take control.
The anger.
The rage.
The pain.

Being victimized.

That's a toxic country abusing itself.
We are lost.
We are lost.
We are lost.
We are lost.
We are lost. https://twitter.com/techstoa/status/1282672003414216705?s=20
An authoritarian, a weak opposition, and a growing police state are parts of a whole. https://twitter.com/umairh/status/1347354043702779905?s=19
The Authoritarians are those of us waiting for a bosses to tell us how to build community.
"But then, if that awareness were to change—and you were to realize that everything is happening of itself, including your decisions—because of your background, you would then veer over to the opposite point of view: everything is happening involuntarily and
I am left out; I am a puppet, I simply have to obey. You see? But this would be incorrect. The point is, rather, this: we don’t have a system of nature which is either deterministic or voluntaristic. The relationship of the individual to the environment is not one of the
individual as some little thing in the environment, which is moved by the environment and responds to the environment passively. Nor, oppositely, do we have a situation in which the individual is a center of activity that, all of its own, to some extent alters and
changes the environment. Both of these opinions are based on lack of awareness or ignorance—ignore-ance—that the behavior of the individual and the behavior of the environment are the same process. And you can look at the process from two points of view. You can look at
it from the point of view of “It’s all happening to me,” or you can look at it from the point of view “I’m doing it.” These are just two poles of two ways of looking at the same thing."
-- alan watts
"What is always the source of the world is the present; the past doesn't explain a thing. The past trails behind the present like the wake of a ship and eventually disappears.”
-- Alan Watts
"You cannot change the past but you can make the future, and anyone who tells you different is a fucking lethargic devil."
-- @ImmortalTech
You can follow @techstoa.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.