Read on Twitter
@Twitter Pates: you deplatform the President of the United States and left this stink up. You censor the phrase “American Patriot”as an incitement to violence and broadcast the odious vile antisemitic phrase, malignant cancer” to be hurled at a foreign nation state recognized= https://twitter.com/khamenei_ir/status/1003332853525110784
by international law rules as one among the world’s family of nations; also, one of America’s allies. The tweet violates customary international law that prohibits propaganda for aggressive war against nation states; violates in international law that prohibits and punishes=
genocide, which this tweet advocates; violates giving material support to designated terrorists or terrorism; violates American law of defamation, violates your own rules against incitement of violence, and I can think of some state criminal laws the broadcast of this tweet, in=
in states having competent jurisdiction. You have chosen to censor the President of the United States by tagging his tweets with your commentary; you have now chosen to ban his communications to the public and an international diplomatic community, while leaving the head of a=
of a designated terrorist state free to broadcast messages in violation of some above mentioned customary international law rules jus cogen; possibly this message violates treaty obligations of the US- it is arguable that, depending on your involvement with the incoming Biden=
which was reported, as I recall after the “election,” the involvement may be construed as elevating you from private corp, to a state actor; thus putting the United States in jeopardy with our treaty obligations, and as an accountable state actor under customary law, jus cogens=
It seems to me that your political discrimination of banning the President’s tweets and allowing a tweet from a head of a designated terrorist state that violates your own rules prohibiting incitement of violence, to remain openly broadcast is not arbitrary and capricious. =
It seems to me the discrimination in the application of your rules in this case of dIscriminatory action between IRAN and the UNITED STATES is an exercise of raw political power. A President of the United States, like an Iranian Supreme Leader or Chief of State represents the=
respective nations as state actors under international law rules. I had no idea that sec 230 or any other law delegates diplomatic discretion or interference with the foreign relations, treaty obligations or responsibilities pursuant to customary law by banning the US President=
and allowing Iran to continue to broadcast its diplomatic and foreign policy of aggressive war to the world. You are a platform or an editor; a private Corp or a state actor? Which are you. This unanswered question, in light of the discriminatory acts against the United States=
begs to be answered. Please advise the public on what bases you discriminate? Citizens of the US are directly impacted by said discrimination of broadcast of foreign policies and relations IMO; we, our reps deserve an answer.
