Read a bunch of @KevinSimler on Social Status today
Will summarize in this thread to make sure I understand
Will summarize in this thread to make sure I understand
He posits that there are two types of social status
Dominance and Prestige
Dominance and Prestige
Dominance is the status we get from intimidating others
The alpha gorilla will beat you up if you're out of line, your boss will fire you, etc
The alpha gorilla will beat you up if you're out of line, your boss will fire you, etc
Prestige is the status we get from doing impressive things
Building a startup, being really good at sports or the arts, etc
Building a startup, being really good at sports or the arts, etc
Dominance is easy to understand because we only need to look at the behavior of the person on top
They use threats and intimidation to control the behavior of others
They use threats and intimidation to control the behavior of others
Prestige is subtler
It only exists because people lower in the status hierarchy admire those with higher status
It only exists because people lower in the status hierarchy admire those with higher status
Looking from the outside, this almost seems illogical
Why would people intentionally give status to someone else?
Why would people intentionally give status to someone else?
Prestige-seeking and admiration behaviors are "teaming instincts"
By staying in a group, the members get more benefit than being outside
By staying in a group, the members get more benefit than being outside
It's possible that, without the Prestige system of social status, group-level cooperation might simply be impossible
There are too many incentives to defect
There are too many incentives to defect