Hot off the press 🔥

Results from our RCT of continuing vs. discontinuing ACEIs vs. ARBs in patients hospitalized with #COVID19!

w/co-PI @JulioChirinosMd in @LancetRespirMed

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30558-0/fulltext

#tweetorial 👇 1/
ACE2, a counterregulatory enzyme in the RAS, is the receptor for SARS-CoV-2 on host cells

Early in the pandemic, a hypothesis emerged that ACEIs & ARBs may ⬆️COVID-19 risk & severity based on prior data that they *might* ⬆️ACE2 expression/activity

https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30116-8

2/
Did we ever get data!

While several trials were underway, >72 observational studies now show no assoc of ACEI/ARBs w/⬆️COVID-19 risk or severity https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-1515

But many of these struggled w/bias
@asouth_neph @LucyStats & I reviewed this 👇
https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002706

4/
Trial data were needed to answer the question of whether it's safe to continue vs. stop ACEIs & ARBs in patients hospitalized w/COVID-19

Our trial, REPLACE COVID, randomized 152 patients at 20 international centers from March-Aug 2020

Design paper 👇
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jch.14011

5/
Our primary outcome was a hierarchical global rank score in which patients were ranked from 1-152 by severity of illness by
1) Time to death
2) Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation
3) Duration of vasopressors or renal replacement therapy
4) AUC of a modified SOFA score

6/
The rank score benefits from higher statistical power compared w/other common approaches & accounts for important factors related to resource use & duration of hospitalization

We observed no difference in median scores btw patients whose ACEIs/ARBs were continued vs. stopped

7/
We also observed no substantial differences in our secondary endpoints, including death, ICU admission or mechanical ventilation, length of hospitalization, & ⬇️BP requiring vasopressors

And no significant effect modification (though ⬇️statistical power to look at this)

8/
For the nephrology & HTN 🤓's

We found no difference in systolic BP, K, & creatinine during follow-up btw groups!

These results were upheld after censoring at the time of crossover btw treatment arms (n=24) & in (unpublished) analyses accounting for time-updated treatment

9/
Strengths of our study include that it's the 1st published RCT in this area

BRACE CORONA presented @escardio, not yet published but saw no dif in 30-days alive & out of hospital w/continuing vs. stopping ACEI/ARB, w/some limitations (young, 11% excluded after study started)

10/
Limitations of REPLACE include:

Small sample size (helped by rank score w/⬆️power than common endpoints & ⬆️events ☹️)

Open-label design (some providers may have behaved differently knowing patients' randomization arms; but we made sure endpoint adjudicators were blinded)

11/
So, consistent w/society recs & considering the observational evidence, our findings support that ACEIs & ARBs can be safely continued in patients who are hospitalized w/COVID-19

Ongoing studies are evaluating if de novo introduction of ARBs is helpful to treat COVID-19

12/
Thank you to the amazing REPLACE COVID investigators, who called to arms as the pandemic started here & almost all of whom contributed w/out funding to support this

@TomHanffMD @taraichang @nicolasrennamd @DanEdmonston @thebyrdlab @nicolasrennamd @CarlosAlfonsoMD + many others
Editorial puts things in excellent context by the great Bryan Williams 👇

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(21)00003-5/fulltext
You can follow @jordy_bc.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.