1. It should be clear that the reason the left's actions aren't as escalated as the right is that the left is very much confined by the boundaries set by the "controlled opposition" agenda set by the Democratic Party. This doesn't mean the right is somehow "more revolutionary."

2. The far-right, composed of mostly petty-bourgeois whites feeling like their dominance is threatened, only become insurrectionary at the moment that they perceive the state is not protecting and advancing their interests. But these interests aren't that of the proletariat.

3. Like @devinzshaw said: 'Far Right movements are system-loyal when they perceive that the entitlements of white supremacy can be advanced within settler-colonial institutions, and they become insurrectionary when they perceive that these entitlements cannot be thus advanced.'

4. So in short:

- Don't confuse the petty-bourgeoisie with the proletariat.

- Don't confuse revolutionary potential with petty-bourgeois reaction.

- Don't confuse revolutionary for insurrectionary and think that insurrectionary necessarily means revolutionary.

5. Lastly, don't think that to organize the working-class into a class conscious force means we have to capitulate to the most reactionary and backward segments of the petty-bourgeoisie (and a tiny fraction of the proletariat) by not challenging the ideology of white supremacy.

6. In capitulating to white supremacy, you are not moving them left. You are moving yourself right.