Read on Twitter
Anyone following the debate might reasonably be expected to have read the defences offered by academic philosopher @byrne_a Is Sex Socially Constructed? https://arcdigital.media/is-sex-socially-constructed-81cf3ef79f07 and Are Women Adult Human Females? https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-019-01408-8 1/ https://twitter.com/EricRoyalLybeck/status/1346807641906028544
Or the excellent five paper discussion David Pilgrim initiated in the Journal of Critical Realism https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14767430.2018.1493842
Or one of the first academic philosophers to venture into this territory who suffered serious harassment for doing so @boodleoops https://aeon.co/essays/the-idea-that-gender-is-a-spectrum-is-a-new-gender-prison
2/
Or one of the first academic philosophers to venture into this territory who suffered serious harassment for doing so @boodleoops https://aeon.co/essays/the-idea-that-gender-is-a-spectrum-is-a-new-gender-prison
2/
Moving on to legal academic studies anyone following the debate will have read crucial papers by @RebeccaMKBull and Prof Asteriti in Modern Law Review https://www.modernlawreview.co.uk/asteriti-bull-sharpe/ and @callie_h_burt in Feminist Criminology https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1557085120918667 3/
Not to mention the discussion on prisons including contributions from Oxford sociologist Michael Biggs https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/43f2t/ and this very widely read case study on prisons from @mbmpolicy in Scottish Affairs https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/43f2t/ 4/
There are just too many on human biology, sport, and the medical treatment of GNC children to start. But if you had been following this debate you would know that in academia, as everywhere, the majority position is that humans have 2 sexes, and that sex matters. 5/5
