Read on Twitter
Disturbing reactions to the #Assange ruling:
US DoJ: "We are gratified that the USA prevailed on every point of law raised."
BBC: the UK judge's conclusions "would be enough for him to be charged with a crime here."
Journalism is being criminalized. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-55528241
US DoJ: "We are gratified that the USA prevailed on every point of law raised."
BBC: the UK judge's conclusions "would be enough for him to be charged with a crime here."
Journalism is being criminalized. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-55528241
The Guardian: Baraitser's ruling "appears to extend the scope of the British Official Secrets Act". But @dansabbagh says she "is on stronger ground" when she condemns Assange for "revealing the names of sources & informants". WTF? Same old @guardian lies! https://www.dumptheguardian.com/media/2021/jan/04/julian-assange-verdict-does-little-protect-press-freedom?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_gu&utm_medium&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1609788309
Remember: Assange worked tirelessly to redact names, while MSM partners went to sleep. @guardian editors revealed the #Cablegate password AND named @xychelsea as their source AND they are still trying to cover it up. #DumpTheGuardian #FreeASSANGE
Pro-establishment worms like Dan Sabbagh, the Guardian's Defence & Security Editor, are actively undermining #PressFreedom by spreading lies like this, which Assange's lawyers conclusively disproved in court. #ThisIsNotJournalism https://twitter.com/dansabbagh/status/1346072042714632193?s=20
