Read on Twitter
1) To @Kevin_McKernan @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath This may appear patronizing & repetitive to you, but as you are REPEATEDLY evading this issue & patronizing lay people who look to you as authorities on a so-called ‘virus’ that has devastated their lives,
I feel it's-
I feel it's-
2) -necessary to simply and repeatedly spell things out:
A ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’, the alleged cause of so-called ‘COVID-19’, is based on ‘theoretical’ (NOT actual, NOT real) sequences supplied by a Chinese laboratory to Professor Christian Drosten & Co, early January 2020.
A ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’, the alleged cause of so-called ‘COVID-19’, is based on ‘theoretical’ (NOT actual, NOT real) sequences supplied by a Chinese laboratory to Professor Christian Drosten & Co, early January 2020.
3) They’re NOT actual sequences because at that time (early January 2020) no 'LIVE' or 'INACTIVE' RNA of the virus was available to Professor Drosten & Co, the INVENTORS of the ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’. https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
4) “To date no validation has been performed by the authorship [Drosten, Corman et al] based on SARS-CoV-2 viruses or full-length RNA thereof”.
Meaning that, until NOW, there’s NO proof the ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’ is anything other than a THEORY.
![4) “To date no validation has been performed by the authorship [Drosten, Corman et al] based on SARS-CoV-2 viruses or full-length RNA thereof”. Meaning that, until NOW, there’s NO proof the ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’ is anything other than a THEORY.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eq45wTnWMAAXVHf.jpg "4) “To date no validation has been performed by the authorship [Drosten, Corman et al] based on SARS-CoV-2 viruses or full-length RNA thereof”. Meaning that, until NOW, there’s NO proof the ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’ is anything other than a THEORY.")
Meaning that, until NOW, there’s NO proof the ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’ is anything other than a THEORY.
5) How is it that, until today, an example of a fully-sequenced, ISOLATED ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’ from an actual infected person has never been provided?
Because Drosten & Co, NOR ANYONE ELSE, is able to MAGIC a purely THEORETICAL virus into an ACTUAL one.
Because Drosten & Co, NOR ANYONE ELSE, is able to MAGIC a purely THEORETICAL virus into an ACTUAL one.
6) And because Drosten & Co took those THEORETICAL sequences from China, did SOME MORE THEORETICAL work, and with the aid of computer programs, simply added and recombined gene sequences from a number of various sources, including RNA sequences common to ALL human beings-
7) -which were stored in gene banks (data banks of gene sequences). Drosten and Co. completely dispensed with the NEED for ACTUAL viral material, or even a test-tube, and used COMPUTERS to construct a THEORETICAL MODEL of a virus and its genome sequences.
8) Professor Drosten called his computer-constructed invention, ‘2019-nCoV’, which was later renamed ‘SARS-CoV-2’.
Meanwhile, in the REAL WORLD, the flu season had begun to pick up steam, so Drosten and his team, which included PCR ‘test’ manufacturer, Olfert Landt, quickly-
Meanwhile, in the REAL WORLD, the flu season had begun to pick up steam, so Drosten and his team, which included PCR ‘test’ manufacturer, Olfert Landt, quickly-
9) -developed a PCR ‘test’ protocol to 'detect' the newly-fabricated, 'SARS-CoV-2' computer virus.
This PCR ‘test’ protocol consisted of some snippets of gene-sequences from Drosten’s computer creation. https://twitter.com/DDawgly/status/1340609499607011328?s=20
This PCR ‘test’ protocol consisted of some snippets of gene-sequences from Drosten’s computer creation. https://twitter.com/DDawgly/status/1340609499607011328?s=20
10) Some of these snippets included those from common sequences of human RNA, as well as RNA sequences from common cold corona-viruses and bacteria that were bound to provide a match, i.e. produce a ‘positive’ test result, in a significant percentage of any population tested.
11) To further ensure any tested population would provide ‘positives’ at a ‘PANDEMIC’ level, they took the added precaution of recommending an amplification cycle setting of 45ct (approximately double the scientifically accepted norm) for their PCR ‘test’ https://twitter.com/DDawgly/status/1343236766170492932?s=20
12) As there was already a predicted heavy flu season underway, they strove to get ‘approval’ to begin mass ‘testing’ for their computer-constructed ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’, ASAP. They IMMEDIATELY got that approval from WHO on January 17th - just a few days after Drosten & Co had-
13) -INVENTED their 'NOVEL' coronavirus and the protocol of their so-called PCR test to 'detect' it. https://twitter.com/DDawgly/status/1340609459782119425?s=20
14) You @Kevin_McKernan @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath are FULLY AWARE Drosten & Co's stated aims were to “develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology [i.e. a test to diagnose a virus] for use in public health laboratory settings WITHOUT VIRUS MATERIAL AVAILABLE”
![14) You @Kevin_McKernan @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath are FULLY AWARE Drosten & Co's stated aims were to “develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology [i.e. a test to diagnose a virus] for use in public health laboratory settings WITHOUT VIRUS MATERIAL AVAILABLE”](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eq5CBjUXIAAgdhY.jpg "14) You @Kevin_McKernan @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath are FULLY AWARE Drosten & Co's stated aims were to “develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology [i.e. a test to diagnose a virus] for use in public health laboratory settings WITHOUT VIRUS MATERIAL AVAILABLE”")
15) You are also FULLY AWARE: “these aims are NOT ACHIEVABLE WITHOUT HAVING ANY VIRUS MATERIAL AVAILABLE” - quoted from the peer-review that eventually took place 10 MONTHS AFTER Corman, Drosten et al got their paper approved & published in a RECORD 2 days (WITHOUT a peer-review)
16) My question is: Why are you @Kevin_McKernan @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath helping to maintain the ILLUSION ‘SARS-CoV-2’ is a real virus, discovered circulating among people, when you all ARE AWARE it is AN INVENTION, FABRICATED USING A COMPUTER by Chistian Drosten & Co?
17) You are ALL also FULLY AWARE that the vaccine manufacturers must be LYING when they say they have developed a VACCINE against the “SARS-CoV-2 virus”, because, AGAIN, you are ALL FULLY AWARE that that ‘virus’ is a computer-fabricated MODEL of a virus.
18) You @Kevin_McKernan @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath are ALSO FULLY AWARE that, whatever it is the pharmaceutical companies have put in their so-called 'vaccines', it CANNOT POSSIBLY BE something to protect against a ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’. https://twitter.com/DDawgly/status/1340609491725934592?s=20
19) You ALL have a voice on social media with an audience who consider you authorities on viruses, @Kevin_McKernan @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath
Why are you NOT calling out the vaccine companies' DANGEROUS LIE, and telling the truth that 'SARS-CoV-2' is NOT a real virus?
Why are you NOT calling out the vaccine companies' DANGEROUS LIE, and telling the truth that 'SARS-CoV-2' is NOT a real virus?
- @Kevin_McKernan DOESN'T want to address this:
"We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available'
"These aims are not achievable without having any actual virus material available"
"We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available'
"These aims are not achievable without having any actual virus material available"