Read on Twitter
This is a good opportunity to address this in a way I have never seen done before, so I am going to make a little thread about it.
I am going to assume some familiarity with the topics, so if you have a question, ask civilly and I will answer.
Let's get to it
https://twitter.com/Cornstock_99/status/1345696150242947072
I am going to assume some familiarity with the topics, so if you have a question, ask civilly and I will answer.
Let's get to it
https://twitter.com/Cornstock_99/status/1345696150242947072
In their first post Q claimed HRC was arrested. Before the end of the day, that had been downgraded to detained, not arrested.
This is a report on a rapidly evolving situation.
It is also possible that this particular leak was unauthorized.
That's possibility number ONE.
This is a report on a rapidly evolving situation.
It is also possible that this particular leak was unauthorized.
That's possibility number ONE.
Note that the first "q" tripcoded post REFERENCES the HRC leak. It is NOT the HRC leak.
Possibility number TWO: The HRC leak was a deliberate test to see how rapidly the information spread.
The CIA did extensive modelling (IMO) on how to spread unverifiable or false information
Possibility number TWO: The HRC leak was a deliberate test to see how rapidly the information spread.
The CIA did extensive modelling (IMO) on how to spread unverifiable or false information
...with Flat Earth (which is a CIA psyop experiment).
NSA could have been doing something similar. Post an inflammatory and exciting leak, and track its speed and breadth of distribution. They have the tools to do this.
This would allow modelling for the Q psyop as a whole.
NSA could have been doing something similar. Post an inflammatory and exciting leak, and track its speed and breadth of distribution. They have the tools to do this.
This would allow modelling for the Q psyop as a whole.
I believe it outperformed their wildest hopes.
I had heard about it by the next day and I have better things to do than live on the chans.
I am an IT guy and I was a Pizzagate researcher. Q effectively piggybacked on the Pizzagate network and grew it.
I had heard about it by the next day and I have better things to do than live on the chans.
I am an IT guy and I was a Pizzagate researcher. Q effectively piggybacked on the Pizzagate network and grew it.
By the time The Intercept wrote their article warning the DS of Pompeo's black ops "private spy network", Q team had a working schedule figured out.
The schedule was designed to gradually increase confirmation and also create the impression of superhuman infallibility...
The schedule was designed to gradually increase confirmation and also create the impression of superhuman infallibility...
However, it had to be disconnected enough and enough plausible disinfo seeded to confuse the enemy.
The majority of the disinfo ended up being distributed through White House press leaks.
Q focused on cryptic and retrospective "proofs".
The majority of the disinfo ended up being distributed through White House press leaks.
Q focused on cryptic and retrospective "proofs".
So, the furthest out (in time) events and POSSIBILITIES were predicted and disseminated FIRST as cryptically as possible.
Because it was cryptic, if Q was wrong (which is about 15% of the time by my estimate) it would be ignored.
If correct, then "Lo, Q is omniscient"...
Because it was cryptic, if Q was wrong (which is about 15% of the time by my estimate) it would be ignored.
If correct, then "Lo, Q is omniscient"...
They aren't omniscient, but they are VERY VERY GOOD. Which, is what you would expect from military professionals with the NSA's supercomputing and data reseources.
Our military is the most effective branch of government.
It also has the highest percentage of Patriots.
Our military is the most effective branch of government.
It also has the highest percentage of Patriots.
So, based on this theory, the entire Q operation ENDS with the arrest of HRC.
So, great, I have a pretty theory.
Is there any support for it?
In fact, there is.
I shall decline to chart every proof on a timeline, but will assert that it generally holds true. Check it.
AND
So, great, I have a pretty theory.
Is there any support for it?
In fact, there is.
I shall decline to chart every proof on a timeline, but will assert that it generally holds true. Check it.
AND
I shall provide the "midpoint proof" on the time line.
I call this, "The Uncomfortable Proof."
It is statistically impossible without advance knowledge. And, it proves the level of access and power Q actually has. Only a government agency could do this.
Here it is
I call this, "The Uncomfortable Proof."
It is statistically impossible without advance knowledge. And, it proves the level of access and power Q actually has. Only a government agency could do this.
Here it is
After this proof occurred, if you don't believe Q is a government operation:
1. You are ignorant.
2. You are in denial.
3. You think Q is a prophet reading tea leaves.
There is no way to predict the death of John McCain TO THE MINUTE, UNLESS...
YOU MAKE IT HAPPEN.
Q is real.
1. You are ignorant.
2. You are in denial.
3. You think Q is a prophet reading tea leaves.
There is no way to predict the death of John McCain TO THE MINUTE, UNLESS...
YOU MAKE IT HAPPEN.
Q is real.
