Read on Twitter
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemlee/stanford-coronavirus-neeleman-ioannidis-whistleblower Smear piece garbage by @stephaniemlee. Turning a $5000 donation to Stanford into a conspiracy involving Ioannidis & other respected scientists. Like how Buzzfeed turned covid19 into the start of an "age of pandemics" #fearmongers #fearsells #fearclicks
What a surprise that the article is based largely on an anonymous whistleblower. I wouldn't want to be named either, considering what an obvious smear this is. $5000 is nothing compared to the money the media/big tech/big pharma & other lockdown profiteers are making.
@Buzzfeed logic = anyone is suspect if they want to end the lockdowns. Even if they got a billion dollar bailout.
Nothing suspicious about all the tech/pharma/media people benefiting from the panicdemic & lying their asses off though.
#MakeFauciDebate for the 1st time in his life
Nothing suspicious about all the tech/pharma/media people benefiting from the panicdemic & lying their asses off though.
#MakeFauciDebate for the 1st time in his life
https://www.kqed.org/forum/2010101864330/the-rise-and-fall-of-theranos
@stephaniemlee covered the fall of Theranos, which was started by John Ioannidis, but she fails to mention that fact in her smear article. Conflict of interest perhaps? Don't want people to know that John is good at spotting massive frauds?
@stephaniemlee covered the fall of Theranos, which was started by John Ioannidis, but she fails to mention that fact in her smear article. Conflict of interest perhaps? Don't want people to know that John is good at spotting massive frauds?
@stephaniemlee's past specialty is covering negative aspects of e-cigs. Shocking. Focusing on the negatives of something that hurts a huge industry (big tobacco) by helping a lot of people quit smoking.
"a Pew Research Center survey found that in the United States, @BuzzFeed was viewed as an unreliable source by the majority of people, regardless of political affiliation"
"many of the site's most popular quizzes were created by unpaid contributors..."
"many of the site's most popular quizzes were created by unpaid contributors..."
An unpaid "college student in Michigan was "the second-highest traffic driver worldwide" for @BuzzFeed
3 posts were "deleted for being critical of products or advertisements by Microsoft, Pepsi, and Unilever"
Well that explains @stephaniemlee's #GatesianAnalysis
3 posts were "deleted for being critical of products or advertisements by Microsoft, Pepsi, and Unilever"
Well that explains @stephaniemlee's #GatesianAnalysis
@stephaniemlee smears anti-lockdown scientists and then shows off that she's 'on vacation.' I'm sure she's sitting at home safely....
Reminds me of China locking down and then throwing a huge maskless pool party to celebrate how stupid we were for copying them.
Reminds me of China locking down and then throwing a huge maskless pool party to celebrate how stupid we were for copying them.
https://gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database#q/k=%22stanford%20university%22
132 donations from Gates Foundation to Stanford. Maybe the anonymous 'whistleblower' was paid?
Are you calling all lockdown-supporting research out of Stanford a conspiracy?
With Gates spending over $250 million on science journalism, I'm guessing not.
132 donations from Gates Foundation to Stanford. Maybe the anonymous 'whistleblower' was paid?
Are you calling all lockdown-supporting research out of Stanford a conspiracy?
With Gates spending over $250 million on science journalism, I'm guessing not.
