1)So, a few days ago I made a thread about how I found a multitude of different companies linked to dominion and how they could have been counterfeit parts put inside these voting machines which would allow for a backdoor into the system that can ultimately skew the vote tallies.
2a) Based on this I have been digging more into Dominion and their past and I found out about a company named “Diebold” which now is a banking company but until the early 2000’s they dealt with voting systems and software. The reason why Diebold doesn’t deal with election...
4a) Another interesting thing about Diebold (in 2004) is according to a whistle blower that they knowingly used machines with fraudulent hardware in it in the California election and planned to cover it up. If this has been going on as early as 2004...
5) Diebold’s CEO around the time was Walden O’Dell and he wrote a letter PROMISSING to “deliver Ohio for George Bush” in the 2004 election. Think about that for a second, why would a VOTING COMPANY promise an election result to a POLITICIAN? https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/itl/vote/2010-07-06VoterActionLetter2TGDC.pdf
6)After Diebold’s election scandal they sold their assets to a company named “ES&S” who has their own sets of problems (I’ll get back to them) who later got split up on monopoly charges. Because of this they sold these assets to, you guessed it, DOMINION.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_Election_Solutions
7) In 2010 this virtually unknown company (Dominion) from Canada with NO reported income managed to rise into the ranks of one of the largest voting machine companies in the United States. And by using “Proprietary source code” developed by Smartmatic.
8a) By using this source code, it allowed Smartmatic used it to rig the Venezuela election in favor of Hugo Chavez, and by claiming its “proprietary” it has prevented auditors in the past from getting a proper inspection of their machines. This is the very same source...
8b) ...code and machines used on the dominion machines in the 2020 election.
https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/itl/vote/2010-07-06VoterActionLetter2TGDC.pdf
10) During a 2010 talk former FBI director Robert Mueller stated that the FBI’s computer network had been attacked by hackers and had “corrupted data” showing that hackers had the ability to alter the source code and could alter voting machines. https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/itl/vote/2010-07-06VoterActionLetter2TGDC.pdf
11) If Smartmatic/dominion has nothing to hid then a full audit of their source code and inspection of the parts inside the voting machines shouldn’t be a problem. Keep in mind Dominion had voting machines located in every contested swing state during the 2020 election
12) The big thing for me is the possible use of the USB sticks with malicious code on them, and how during election night and the days after we heard countless stories of missing USB drives, why would they forget to put those back unless they had something to hide?
13) Another example is the video that went viral of the young man palming a flash drive then quickly going to a back room then coming back moments later, these USB’s very well could have impacted thousands of votes in a single county.
14a) From what I have gathered it shows that Diebold’s assets during its voting system days have been passed around from company to company after anyone starts to question or catch these appeared rigged machines. It also shows that Dominion currently owns the patents...
14b) ...to the questioned machines from many years ago and were more thank likely used in the 2020 election.
You can follow @CryptoPatriot55.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.