Read on Twitter
The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...
Courts should treat people with respect while not losing their grasp on reality
Taylor v Jaguar - the Tribunal rewrote history to avoid using pronouns as they actually were at the time
Courts should treat people with respect while not losing their grasp on reality
Taylor v Jaguar - the Tribunal rewrote history to avoid using pronouns as they actually were at the time
Forstater v CGD
The Tribunal's primary concern with language was not giving offence
The Tribunal's primary concern with language was not giving offence
Employment Judge James Tayler used "assigned at birth" because I didn't say it is offensive 
No, its just nonsense.
No, its just nonsense.
Maria Maclachlan was made to refer to her male assailant as "she" https://www.feministcurrent.com/2018/06/21/interview-maria-maclauchlan-gra-aftermath-assault-speakers-corner/
On the other hand: Bell v Tavistock starts with a good reality based definition of gender dysphoria.
Judge Julian Knowles in Harry Miller v College of Policing says he doesn't intend to diminish people's experience but he is going to use the language 'man' and 'woman' to refer to biological sex
Judges take leave of reality because the Equal Treatment Benchbook and associated training tells them to.
They say "whats the harm"?
The harm is we you don't start with a commitment to the truth then how can justice be served?
The harm is we you don't start with a commitment to the truth then how can justice be served?
