I am instinctively uneasy about the proposal to delay/skip the second dose of #COVID19 #vaccine. My worry is that the protection will be incomplete and/or wane. Here is some data that speaks to that worry, for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2814-7

(With thanks to @StridLab for drawing my attention to it.) 2/
First, I want to note that this data is from BNT162b1. This is the same platform as the vaccine that was approved (BNT162b2) but a shorter mRNA. It was equally immunogenic, but was not taken forward because it was slightly less well tolerated. 3/
That said, the response to BNT162b1 in the absence of a boost – which this paper looked at – will probably give us a good idea about what will happen with BNT162b2 (the approved vaccine). And it’s not promising. 4/
Below, I highlight the 30ug dose with a boost at 21d (the approved schedule) in blue and the dose without a boost in red. 5/
To me, this suggests that for this vaccine platform, the single dose strategy is a poor one. Pfizer has put out a statement saying they cannot recommend the single dose strategy. 9/ https://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-vaccine-updates-12-31-20/h_bfcaa459912301f12f220cbb4836efba
For the Oxford/AZ vaccine, there is some evidence to suggest that a delayed boost strategy might work, but it’s confounded by all sorts of other variables. Fuller explanation from @dgurdasani1 here... 10/ https://twitter.com/dgurdasani1/status/1344727697524740101?s=20
So I feel marginally better about the delayed boost strategy for that vaccine, but I am still wary. 11/
I get that we’re in a mess (largely of our own making) but I’m not convinced that stretching limited supplies of vaccine in this way is the way out of it. Particularly for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, partial/waning protection seems likely and could even make things worse. 12/12