The Unions - and as a former @Telegraph and now @FT I'm not exactly classic Union-defending stock - are legitimately asking the government to show/explain their reasoning. To answer hard questions, make a difficult case. When the numbers (see above) looks so bleak. /13
The government's consistent track record of head in the sand denials, followed by U-turns and fact-facing that leaves everyone confused and in the lurch really doesn't help beget a rational discussion around an issue that deeply affects all of us, one way or another /14
I want schools to stay open. My son does GCSEs this year. I sincerely hope he can still sit at least a version of those exams if the vaccine is rolled out by spring, but if #COVID19 has taught us anything, it's surely that we can't always have what we want /15
Time now is for everyone to stop second-guessing everyone else's motives. To look at the science and come up with best-case plans, in the light of the facts as they are, not as we'd wish them to be.
And with that, I must go roll out my pastry for dinner. ENDS
And with that, I must go roll out my pastry for dinner. ENDS
PS...one other fact is testing. The lateral flow test is not that sensitive, but if a regime could be stood up, it might make a difference...but again, given the numbers, it looks like it would have be done fast and be very effective. Not clear yet how realistic that is.