Read on Twitter
A case study from Sweden about why allowing Boston Consulting Group anywhere near the reform of our health and social care systems is unwise and possiblybreckless (if its role in test and trace/Operation Moonshot hasn't already told us that)... 1/
'Boston Consulting Group earned enormous money from the implementation of management ideas that were really not very well tested at all. Moreover, many of the consultants had no experience from health care and were very young.' 2/ https://www.asacajander.se/2019/06/17/kampen-on-karolinska-konsulterna-by-anna-gustafsson-and-lisa-rostlund/
... From a review of the book, Kampen on Karolinska: Konsulterna, roughly translated as The Battle for Karolinska Hospital: The Consultants, or The Consultants: The Struggle for Karolinska University Hospital. 3/
The book, by two investigative journalists of repute, Anna Gustavsson and Lisa Röstlund of @dagensnyheter, tells of conflicts of interest and how BCG's work 'resulted in an exponential growth in administration and lack of responsibility for patients'. 4/
(Two outcomes diametrically opposite those promised as a result of BCG's much-touted 'blueprint' for children's social care, shepherded by BCG's UK think tank the Centre for Public Impact and the English children's social work training scheme it founded, Frontline.)
'The ideas of the Boston Consulting Group were doomed to fail. Any completely new, untried and untested approach should be implemented by people with knowledge and experience and grow organically over years.' 5/
http://rinckside.org/Columns/2019%2006%20Vasa%20repeat.htm
http://rinckside.org/Columns/2019%2006%20Vasa%20repeat.htm
