1/
£151 MILLION of British public money has been spent to date on @inquiryCSA.
The cause is noble, and I would happily see a £BILLION spent if it led to lasting change for #csa survivors.
But the signs are not good. This thread explains why.

2/
@inquirycsa has delivered a total of 63 recommendations across its investigations reports in 6 years. By rudimentary math, that is £2.5 million per recommendation. The following tweets lay out 5 serious flaws with this effort.

3/
The recommendations @inquirycsa have issues are inconsistently worded with some organizations being investigated getting an easier time than others for no good reason. See this write-up on the Roman Catholic Church vs the Anglican Church..

4/
The wording used in the @inquirycsa recommendations is often so soft and vague as to be near to useless… see this analysis.

5/
Mandatory Reporting, as laid out by the account @mandatenow has not been incorporated by @inquirycsa into its recommendations. See http://mandatenow.org.uk/  for more on this important topic.

6/
There is no robust process by which @inquirycsa recommendations become law/public policy. Nobody owns the task of turning a recommendation into law…

7/
There is no central moral or cultural tenet within the @inquirycsa recommendations. An example of what that could like is in my pinned tweet.

Not a great return on 151 million pounds. Thanks for reading.