Likewise, although good to see, using 3 U.S.C. 15 (objections by Senate & 140 House members in writing, for ex., etc.) would likely fail at this point for Trump since both a majority of the House & Senate have to agree to sustain the objection to Certificates by the Governors.
Moreover, using 3 U.S.C. 15 is not proper in this situation (in my opinion) since no conclusive final determination / ascertainment (lawful certification) has occurred (under 3 U.S.C. 5 or 6) since ALL POTENTIAL judicial action has not yet been exhausted.
The proper & more Constitutional & Statutorily consistent remedy is for Pence to exclude the Cert. of Votes & Ascertainment from those States where the fraud occurred for non-receipt (3 U.S.C. 12 & 13), since the Certificates have no legal effect because of the fraud.
Also, Pence should accept any Certificates &/or direction from the State Legislatures appointing Trump Electors & their Votes since Art. 1 of U.S. Const. clearly states, “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors . . .“
Either way, the BURDEN would then SHIFT to the Dems to try to get Supreme Court intervention & moreover the BURDEN SHIFTS to them to prove that no fraud occurred. This is the only/safest strategy I see working at this time for a Trump win (in my opinion).
You can follow @briancremy.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.