There are a number of sub-groups of #uranium stocks whose value proposition appeals to specific individuals, which others may view as probably junk.

Largely this depends on taste, outlook & bias. Most of the companies have at least one 'evil twin' and often we find 1 good 1 bad

But someone else would find the opposite.
If I gave examples of these similarities, both sides would think/say "you idiot, mine is clearly better and they're not at all the same."
Often I'd fall on one side or the other, but I still can recognize them as similar for some reason.

They can be neighbors or thousands of miles apart but have similar value propositions. I know, sometimes my opinion will prove correct, other times it won't. I know there are some that I haven't seen the point and others smarter than me own, where my view has proved right & wrong

The problem is, we are all individuals acting in a market. All those things that we think are overvalued, someone else is absolutely convinced it's undervalued. It's not about the smarter person always being right... I mean look at the market.

Value is arbitrary. Probability is personal. Risk is a choice.

What one person thinks is ridiculous, another thinks is a no brainer... Both may be right.

If you know what you own, why and what the risk is, you can listen to others and not make disagreements personal.

Everyone DYOR but know that you can also be plain wrong.

P.S. In the case of what you're thinking I'm discussing, I have tons or respect for both sides, have a stance & dumb specific thoughts. I believe I can defend my stance decently & can completely see why it's polarizing yet mostly arbitrary.
Thread here was generalized thoughts.