Read on Twitter
This is really mis-guided. "Objecting" is a political act. It's provided for by statute. It leads to debate over the bases for the objection. It's not a courtroom -- it's on the floor of a legislative body performing Constitutional duty. https://twitter.com/TPCarney/status/1344691560085135360
Calling attention to voting irregularities - whether in the vote process or the tabulation process -- is not the same as making meritless claims of fraud. It is part of the public debate intended to bring about change in future elections.
These are elected representatives. They represent their constituents. Most of those objecting will come from states and represent districts who voted in favor of the losing candidate, and the question the processes used elsewhere.
2020 involved a confluence of factual events that made the election itself unique -- the massive expansion of mail-in ballots, which were then counted in centralized locations by hand sometimes with no observers monitoring the process.
There are never any stories of GOP county officials excluding Dem. Party observers from watching voting or vote counting processes, but EVERY election cycle has such stories about Dem. party "machines" in big cities taking steps to limit GOP observers from watching them.
The debate over the legitimacy of the process employed in any state is one that is appropriate for Jan. 6. After the debate, Congress votes. Follow the statute, and there's you outcome.
To rule that procedure out of bounds in advance is itself undemocratic.
