The reasons to get bent out of shape at someone not adopting a particular tactic are a) if you have a very high level of certainty about the tactic's effect on outcome for your strategy or b) if it undermines solidarity (a particular strike may be ill-timed or have strategic
2/ errors, but if your co-workers are on strike you don't fucking scab). If someone isn't doing a thing that you think is a good idea, you should ask yourself how big of an effect that thing will have and how certain you are about that outcome, and then if the rest of the
3/ Movement has already committed to the thing and will be left out to dry if you don't back them up. People should be honest that sometimes it's actually hard to guess how much earned media a thing will get, or what the effect of a given maneuver on mid-term elections two years
4/ out will be. Things like "Did you support the only presidential candidate backing medicare for all instead of another one" is probably a good litmus test for someone being a comrade in that fight. "Do you agree on the earned media effects of one procedural maneuver enough
5/ to excommuniate people not fully invested in that strategy" is probably not a great litmus test.