Conventional wisdom seems to be that playing a 4-4-2 diamond vs a system which relies upon fullbacks bombing forward may be unwise. This question/issue has obvious potential implications for Saturday's huge Celtic vs Rangers derby. I've tried to test this and my examination has
resulted in some interesting "results." First I want to state in advance that my analysis is not comprehensive and the scope of my "universe" is limited. I basically looked at a few prominent teams that deployed 4-3-3 as a major system, then look at what opponents played vs them,
and finally how 4-4-2 diamond faired when it was used.

My first observation is that conversational "wisdom" appears to be just that- very few teams appear to deploy 4-4-2 diamond vs the 4-3-3 for the teams I reviewed: Rangers, Liverpool, Man City, and some of Barcelona
prior to this season. For example, Rangers have faced it for 21 minutes so far this season in all competitions from what I can find. Last season they faced it in parts of 2 games for a total of 66 minutes.

Similarly, Liverpool have faced 4-4-2 diamond very little- zero this
season so far and just 6% of minutes last season in all competitions. This is where things get interesting- guess which teams deployed the shape as primary vs Liverpool? Brighton, Salzburg and Arsenal- all clubs who invest in analytics.

In fact, when I aggregate the npxG
vs Liverpool when they have played 4-3-3 vs 4-4-2 diamond, it was 2.06 vs 1.85 per 90 minutes last season. Brighton actually outperformed 2.47 vs 2.22 over 100 minutes on July 8th in 3-1 defeat.

In the classic 4-3 Liverpool win over Salzburg in last season's Champions League
Salzburg deployed 4-4-2 diamond after starting the game in traditional 4-4-2 for 30 minutes. npxG for the 34 minutes in which Liverpool played 4-3-3 vs the diamond was 1.84 vs 1.49 in Salzburg's favor. Klopp actually changed to 4-2-3-1 to see the game out.

Interestingly, the 1
game in Europe in which Rangers have faced the diamond under Gerrard was vs Villarreal on November 8, 2018. Rangers switched to 4-2-3-1 after 22 minutes and 3 good scoring chances by Villarreal.

This is a trend I have noticed across this matchup- 4-3-3 vs 4-4-2 diamond, where
the team in 4-3-3 struggles and then changes shape.

I expanded my review to include 3-4-2-1 and 3-4-1-2, which have also become en vogue among analytics-heavy clubs. Guess what?!? Brighton deployed it this season in a 1-1 draw vs Liverpool with npxG of 1.65 vs 0.47 in their
favor, and Atalanta won 2-0 with 1.41 vs 0.22 npxG in their favor. Even in the 5-0 drubbing Atalanta suffered in the other group game vs Liverpool, npxG was 2.22 vs 1.12 to Liverpool.

Back to the 21 minutes Rangers have faced 4-4-2 diamond this season- it was at home to
Galatasaray in 2-1 win. Galatasaray played 4-1-4-1 vs Rangers' 4-3-3 for the 1st 73 minutes, when they switched to the diamond. Rangers switched to 4-5-1 after 5 minutes.

Obviously this is all high level and personnel and teams are all different. My next thread will look at
how Celtic's version of 4-4-2 diamond may match-up vs the Rangers. Whether 4-4-2 diamond or 3-4-2-1, overloading the midfield seems like it may be the sought after kryptonite for the narrow 4-3-3. Fullbacks be damned. End.
You can follow @jucojames.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.