Think Joanna Cherry sits on this committee as well, which is ironic, given how much bullying she’s been subjected 2

Rounds of Consultations can seem tedious but we’re all on holidays & this should be really easy to fill in, if u did the Hate Crime & Communications Consultations.
2. Does current police guidance and practice on hate speech law help promote freedom of expression?
Definitely not. All non-Crime hate incidents need to be reviewed, especially in light of Harry Miller case. https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1334818690513186816?s=20
What’s happening with @SVPhillimore doesn’t lead me to believe “current police guidance and practice on hate speech law help promote freedom of expression”.

A comment about her dog means she’s now logged in a Police file, for a non criminal act. https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1325737143545835521?s=20
I don’t think the Police themselves believe that... https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1337754328002686977?s=20
What obligations does an employee have to their employer when expressing views on social media, and to what extent can, and should, employers respond to what their employees say on these platforms?

Let’s ask the teacher at Eton, shall we? https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1334624396850425860?s=20
He was sacked from Eton for putting a video that disagreed with the prevailing orthodoxy of “Feminism” on his personal YouTube page. https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1334806486204231683?s=20
Or how about Helen Lewis? https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1325761495435800578?s=20
Her voice was digitally erased from a video game because she talked about the reality of biological sex https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1325071806445838336?s=20
@SonyaDouglas - removed from @Critic_Speak podcast with ‘immediate effect’ at the behest of a group that would include white, male-bodied people identifying as oppressed, because her “words are fine for white guilt, but not for male entitlement”. https://twitter.com/SonyaDouglas/status/1339603475668238350?s=20
Kevin Price, porter at Cambridge University deemed a “potential risk” by Students at Cambridge calling for his resignation or suspension for his views on a far from settled public debate on the competing rights of Women & Trans individuals? https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1321144554087735300?s=20
Question:- Is greater clarity required to ensure the law is understood and fair?”
Depends on who it’s coming from. Our judges seem to understand importance of Article 10 fine, but it’s clear the Law Commission & certain lobby groups don’t have a scooby. https://twitter.com/prestonjbyrne/status/1339685022085902336?s=20
Meanwhile our Judges whose job it is to interprete the current laws for us are adopting a sensible middle ground for the most part: https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1338470235922423808?s=20
Even the @BBC don’t seem to understand the importance of Freedom of Expression https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1337453344835637250?s=20
Or read the freedom of expression Provisos we have in LAW, to protect free speech. https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1337454019061686272?s=20
@Ofcom also appear to be very confused & together with their CEO @dawes_melanie, and are taking advice from lobbyists like Stonewall as to how to manage the silencing of their critics, which is surely a breach of article 10? https://twitter.com/MrJohnNicolson/status/1338804523905716231?s=20
As Damian Green points out, this is very inappropriate position for a senior REGULATOR to take. (You aren’t supposed to take sides & silence voices you don’t like in a legitimate debate.) https://twitter.com/TwisterFilm/status/1339302559803117571?s=20
Some Labour Party members understanding of Article 10 & “discussion, criticism/ expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions/ beliefs/ practices of their adherents, of any belief system” appear severely limited. https://twitter.com/GeorgeAylett/status/1344041433301446664?s=20
Article 10 in full.
It would appear Cambridge University has struck the right balance. https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1336736875923509249?s=20
The Scottish Police Federation also appear to realise the importance of Freedom of Expression: https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1338546347595751428?s=20
As can be seen from the @Kate_Scottow80 appeal, where the court appointed Justice Warby, one of the most powerful media judges in the country and a leading expert on privacy law, to hear the case. https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1343974278031699968?s=20
He found a “fundamental tension” btwn "most cases” of harassment by speech that includes "alarming the person or causing the person distress" & Article 10 of Human Rights Act 1998 which expressly protects speech that ‘offends, shocks & disturbs’ but still: https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1343974424517730308?s=20
It’s also worth looking at the Miller judgement to see how the Senior Judiciary view Freedom of Expression:

“In this country we have never had a Cheka, a Gestapo or a Stasi. We have never lived in an Orwellian society.”
-Justice Julian Knowles https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1338063316288237568?s=20
As @SVPhillimore notes, there is “an interesting tension develop now as to how the Law Commission wishes the law was, and how the High Court knows it to be” https://twitter.com/AdamWagner1/status/1339182774989828099?s=20
Some people might also find Lord Hunt’s distinctions between the person & the practice helpful when considering the limitations of freedom of speech: https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1338080045575843840?s=20
In the end, the greatest “clarity required to ensure the law is understood and fair”, may be to understand the differences between Tolerance & Respect: https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1338580733598822405?s=20
Selina Todd has also written about the feeling restricted & subject to “cancel culture”, though Academics are supposedly protected by Education Reform Act 1988 "to ensure academic staff have freedom within the law to question & test received wisdom...” https://twitter.com/MsGiveZeroFox/status/1330289323938295808?s=20
Although It’s not illegal (yet) to believe in biological reality, the amazing Kathleen Stock who’s just been awarded an OBE, has also detailed some of the restrictions in Academia now https://twitter.com/BluskyeAllison/status/1344597099359440898?s=20
And kindly documented by herself here: https://twitter.com/Docstockk/status/1344206207482032130?s=20
The price Academia is paying for Freedom of Expression when not in tune with current dogma, is really high:

Complaints, public shaming, losing publishing opportunities, being dropped from collaborations.

People are terrified of saying anything. https://twitter.com/anonacademic_uk/status/1344242066587607040?s=20
See @8RosarioSanchez story. I have a soft spot for her 😍. Maybe because years ago, I also left my country to attend university. Luckily, I slotted right in, but what if I was in Rosario’s shoes, far away from home? I think Bristol’s treatment is abysmal. https://twitter.com/plebity/status/1344427620411334656?s=20
And yet another fabulous thread in detail from the amazing @Docstockk😍, who’s using her moment in the spotlight to shine a light on the shameful behaviour of academia when it comes to Freedom of Expression around legitimate areas of concern. https://twitter.com/Docstockk/status/1344525004973682689?s=20
Also from Maya Forstater 😍. So I think we can safely say, in answer to Freedom of Expression Enquiry “has the situation changed in universities in the two years since the Committee’s report on the issue?”
Not for the Better. Get your answers in to them! https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1344676769727733763?s=20
Professor Sullivan, on the other hand is Director of 1 of the UK’s biggest social science projects, and was due to speak at a seminar alongside officials from the ONS, which is organising the 2021 census. We are shutting up experts in favour of letting ideological cranks inđŸ€ŻđŸ€ŠđŸŸâ€â™€ïž
So I guess answer to the final question in this Enquiry,
“Does everyone have equal protection of their right to freedom of expression?” Is a big Fat No.
When misogynists openly call Women C*nts w/o sanction & yet Women are bullied, hounded from their jobs for biological reality
Just some more Freedom of Speech Limitations.

This time from @Ofcom https://twitter.com/paullewismoney/status/1344913931148652544?s=20
“The way universities have to approach this, like other difficult issues, is 2 defend academic freedom & uphold free speech, as long as it is within law.”
-Colin Riordan, vice-chancellor of Cardiff University

Universities are becoming bastions of bigotry https://twitter.com/anonacademic_uk/status/1344934863611322369?s=20
More evidence of stifling freedom of speech in academia: https://twitter.com/anonacademic_uk/status/1346508635594227717?s=20
Without freedom of speech, we wouldn’t have had the Enlightenment Period, or the Industrial Revolution, or the prosperity the UK has today. https://twitter.com/DavidDavisMP/status/1351494840584986626?s=20
More freedom of speech limitations from Eton. It’s actually frightening how pervasive this #chillingeffect and silencing culture is now: https://twitter.com/unherd/status/1352247243710062595?s=20
Question to be answered in Freedom of Expression inquiry, which ends this Sunday.

“Is greater clarity required to ensure the law is understood and fair? https://twitter.com/joannaccherry/status/1353991815301648384?s=20
You can follow @MsGiveZeroFox.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.