MASSIVE PROBLEM in GA [and around the country?] w/ regard to every single adjudicated ballot that would effect any potential recounts, per witness "There was a point in that video where we showed that, Richard Barron, who had said that 113k ballots had been cast and 105k were

2/ adjudicated. Now, that's not physical possible, which we can prove mathematically, but at the same time, if you adjudicate 105k votes, you have to understand from a technological perspective, as we've delved into all the different aspects of how the vote moves along, when you

3/ adjudicate a ballot, that old reference [THE ORIGINAL BALLOT IMAGE] that you saw, or anything like that, is COMPLETELY DESTROYED. It's gone. You can no longer reference [it]. And when you go run a hand recount, like you did in GA, then you're looking at the print-out of those

4/ ballots scans. So at no point did the original voter intent enter into that process once it's destroyed. That's the one thing I don't hear people talking about that's very, very important. The original ballot that you cast, especially from an absentee point is destroyed

5/ and replaced with a new image. With no meta-data. No trail. And even from an audit perspective, you know, it would fail, because they're all using the same account to audit. So you don't know who made that change. You don't know how many times that change was made in the past

6/ and if I had a group of two-people, the Republican and Democrat [which used to be 3 people], that were auditing something ... the only thing you would see from the end perspective, data-wise, is that final audit. You would not see any intermediate audit, or any intermediate

7/ ballot image or the original ballot image, so keep that in mind when we're talking about adjudicated ballots."

Can this possibly be true? If so, how on earth did we ever let it happen? This is a major problem with regard to ensuring the integrity of our elections.

8/ VIDEO from today’s GA hearing.