💥📢💥Here’s a breakdown of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 invoked by Trump. In signing the $900 billion pork-laden “stimulus” bill that was presented to him by the political establishment, President Donald Trump invoked a little-known law called the Impoundment Control Act
1. of 1974, the implications of which have many people scratching their heads in confusion. A public announcement from the president about his signing of the pork package revealed that he has decided to send it back to Congress with demands for “many rescissions,” such as the
3. wasteful items need to be removed.” The president returned a “redlined version” of the bill back to Congress specifying “item by item” which funds, i.e. wasteful spending programs, need to be removed from it.

While it certainly sounds great on the surface, does Trump’s
4.invocation of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 actually have any teeth? What we know so far is that Congress now has an obligation to either address and remove Trump’s redlined items or have funding for all of the redlined items in question frozen for 45 days.
6. the original source. “The ICA requires that the President send a special message to Congress identifying the amount of the proposed rescission; the reasons for it; and the budgetary, economic, and programmatic effects of the rescission.” In other words, Trump now has an
7.opportunity to force the hand of Congress to either remove all the pork or face some unknown consequences. At the very least, some members of Congress who are on the verge of being replaced may feel compelled to take action rather than let the 45 days elapse because doing
8.nothing would negatively impact them. “Upon transmission of such a special message, the President may withhold certain funding in the affected accounts for up to 45 legislative session days. If a law approving the rescission is not enacted within the 45 days, any withheld funds
9. must be made available for obligation,” Conservative U.S. further explains. “Congress can ignore it and after 45 days the funds are released. And they have to be made available and ready before then anyway … In this case, they won’t ignore it.”
10.While there are still some uncertainties about how the whole thing will actually play out, it would appear as though Congress has now been coerced to act rather than do nothing because by the time 45 days passes, there will be a completely new Congress as well as potentially
11.two new leaders of the House and Senate. There is a good chance that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will be ousted from her position, for instance. Representative-elects Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman, two “progressives,” both deflected questions on CNN‘s “State of the Union” show
12.about whether or not they would vote to keep Pelosi in her position – suggesting that they might be planning to oust her. New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), a proud Democratic socialist, has been more forthcoming about her intentions, indicating that she will not be
13. supporting Pelosi should the speaker choose to run again. According to AOC, there needs to be far more progressive leadership in the Democrat Party, and Pelosi is both corrupt and regressive.
@threadreaderapp unroll please
You can follow @808TeslaY.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.