Lmao, their "code" involved cannibalism & sacrificing children.
Archaeologist Joyce Marcus notes:
"We also have good evidence for human sacrifice in the archaeological record.
Immediate sacrifice of victims taken in raids was a common practice, also offering of children & adults" https://twitter.com/Hayatokaw/status/1344248808620793856
"There are a number of elements in Maya religion for which archaeological evidence might be sought:
the rituals themselves, including the burning of incense, HUMAN SACRIFICE, animal sacrifice, ritual bloodletting & CANNIBALISM"
(/2)
"The most common victim of sacrifice, FOLLOWING HUMAN BEINGS, was the domestic dog."
"Children were also sacrificed, some of these being orphans, others purchased or even kidnapped."

mUh "c0dE" Lmao
(/3)
Now, cannibalism is condemned in our faith (Ekalavya, Ravana, Shurpanakha), & as such, going by the definition of Civilization, I would never call such people as "Civilized"or a "Civilization"or "having a c0dE", especially one that involves cannibalism

(/4)
Looking at people in terms of "civilised" & "tribals" itself is a very colonial notion & extremely relative.
Eg;
Britons consider(ed) us Vedic Hindus "Tribals".
Colonized Indians consider(ed) Britain "Civilization".
(/5)
I don't consider Britons a civilization, because Britons were cannibals themselves while we had Takshshila, Nalanda, Valabhi, Vikramshila. Me personally, anything outside of Vedic civilization is "uncivilized" (/6)

Credits to @Trueindology ji for the find https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/bones-provide-irrefutable-evidence-ancient-britons-were-cannibals-5365833.html
Bones provide 'irrefutable evidence' that ancient Britons were

Archaeologists have the first firm evidence that the Ancient Britons were cannibals. The discovery has immense implications for our understanding of ancient native religions.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/bones-provide-irrefutable-evidence-ancient-britons-were-cannibals-5365833.html
Regardless, My refutation was directed towards you saying "Civilisation" was required for writing/scripture, & Tribes couldn't write, which I proved wrong. Whether you would still call Mayan cannibals "Civilisation" or Tribe, that's upto you ji🙂
(/end) https://twitter.com/TheBrokenTusk/status/1344248415270658048?s=20
Source:
Archaeology and Religion: A Comparison of the Zapotec and Maya by Joyce Marcus
Journal of World Archaeology Vol. 10, No. 2, Archaeology and Religion (Oct., 1978),
pp. 172-191
Published By: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.

Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249007071_Archaeology_and_religion_A_comparison_of_the_Zapotec_and_Maya
(PDF) Archaeology and religion: A comparison of the Zapotec and Maya

PDF | This paper deals with the way ethnohistoric models can be used as a framework for organizing archaeological data, and in turn how archaeology can... | Find, read and cite all the research you...

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249007071_Archaeology_and_religion_A_comparison_of_the_Zapotec_and_Maya
You can follow @TheBrokenTusk.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.