Read on Twitter
FWIW House "Patriot Republicans" Tactics Explained
-Simply put, Rs plan to object to EVs on numerous grounds.
-Raising Objections, one after another.
-Trying to get them to also object to *individual* EVs on procedural grounds (a leftist tactic).
-This way the count drags on.
-Simply put, Rs plan to object to EVs on numerous grounds.
-Raising Objections, one after another.
-Trying to get them to also object to *individual* EVs on procedural grounds (a leftist tactic).
-This way the count drags on.
FWIW House 2
-During Election 1876, Dems raised an objection to ONE R electoral vote in Oregon on a technicality.
-Under the ECA of 1887, this would trigger a 2 hour debate over a single EV.
-So, my suggestion is they challenge EVs individually as well as state slates in toto.
-During Election 1876, Dems raised an objection to ONE R electoral vote in Oregon on a technicality.
-Under the ECA of 1887, this would trigger a 2 hour debate over a single EV.
-So, my suggestion is they challenge EVs individually as well as state slates in toto.
FWIW House 3
-In theory, this would take hundreds of hours to process.
-For example, PA's 20 EVs, which the SL has petitioned Congress to reject, would take 20 x 2 = 40 hours to debate.
-During the debate, evidence can be presented on live
.
-In theory, this would take hundreds of hours to process.
-For example, PA's 20 EVs, which the SL has petitioned Congress to reject, would take 20 x 2 = 40 hours to debate.
-During the debate, evidence can be presented on live
.
FWIW House 4
-I speak more to those tactic on Episode 003 of Max Radio on RSBN.
-Once an objection is raised and debated both houses must vote on whether to accept or reject the EVs.
-House Rs are planning to vote by Delegation, as 12A stipulates (the ECA is silent on this).
-I speak more to those tactic on Episode 003 of Max Radio on RSBN.
-Once an objection is raised and debated both houses must vote on whether to accept or reject the EVs.
-House Rs are planning to vote by Delegation, as 12A stipulates (the ECA is silent on this).
FWIW House 5
-Dems will challenge this premise, but it will be up to the presiding officer (the President of the Senate) to adjudicate the dispute.
-If Rs win this argument w/the Senate President, it is likely the Dem House will sustain objections even if the R Senate does not.
-Dems will challenge this premise, but it will be up to the presiding officer (the President of the Senate) to adjudicate the dispute.
-If Rs win this argument w/the Senate President, it is likely the Dem House will sustain objections even if the R Senate does not.
FWIW House 6
-Regardless, this is *within* the confines of the Electoral Count Act of 1887.
-As I said in Episode 1-2 of the Max Radio broadcasts, the VP could IMHO place it on the side.
So, pray if you pray and if you don't...maybe you should start.
-Regardless, this is *within* the confines of the Electoral Count Act of 1887.
-As I said in Episode 1-2 of the Max Radio broadcasts, the VP could IMHO place it on the side.
So, pray if you pray and if you don't...maybe you should start.
*Place the Act on the side.
