What do you tell:
A 52 yo F w/ active smoking, DM, HLD, and HTN
who p/w DOE & chest pain with evening walks
whose LHC is negative for stenoses,
& CXR, PFTs, TTE are all unrevealing?
"Don’t worry, you'll be fine…here's a xanaz", right?
WRONG….let's dig deeper. #tweetorial
A 52 yo F w/ active smoking, DM, HLD, and HTN
who p/w DOE & chest pain with evening walks
whose LHC is negative for stenoses,
& CXR, PFTs, TTE are all unrevealing?
"Don’t worry, you'll be fine…here's a xanaz", right?

2/13
What's the next step to evaluate her classic angina?
What's the next step to evaluate her classic angina?
3/13
Running behind on a busy clinic...why dig deeper
Well, coronary angiography only "sees" a tiny portion of the coronary tree.
Beyond the epicardial horizon, there's a vast network of pre-arterioles, arterioles, and capillaries.
https://www.jacc.org/doi/full/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.09.006?_ga=2.41049127.449998764.1609185083-652351969.1608141845
Running behind on a busy clinic...why dig deeper



https://www.jacc.org/doi/full/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.09.006?_ga=2.41049127.449998764.1609185083-652351969.1608141845
4/13
Coronary Microvascular Disease (CMD) = disease of these smaller vessels.
Normally, small resistance vessels regulate blood flow.
Abnormalities in these compromise blood flow:
Structural
Functional
Extravascular
https://www.jacc.org/doi/full/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.042
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.031373
Coronary Microvascular Disease (CMD) = disease of these smaller vessels.
Normally, small resistance vessels regulate blood flow.
Abnormalities in these compromise blood flow:



https://www.jacc.org/doi/full/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.042
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.031373
5/13
Ok, I get it. Coronary angio's can't see the vast majority of the coronary tree and CMD can exist without epicardial CAD.
But why is this so important
Because: CMD w/o obstructive epicardial CAD --> a/w
4x mortality
5x MACE
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/JAHA.119.014954
Ok, I get it. Coronary angio's can't see the vast majority of the coronary tree and CMD can exist without epicardial CAD.


Because: CMD w/o obstructive epicardial CAD --> a/w


https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/JAHA.119.014954
6/13
Fine, CMD is important to look for, but how if we can't see these vessels?
There are invasive and noninvasive tools.
In all of these, look at flow (velocity or tissue perfusion) at rest and stress.
Stress / Rest = cor flow reserve (CFR) = evaluates entire coronary tree.
Fine, CMD is important to look for, but how if we can't see these vessels?
There are invasive and noninvasive tools.
In all of these, look at flow (velocity or tissue perfusion) at rest and stress.
Stress / Rest = cor flow reserve (CFR) = evaluates entire coronary tree.
7/13
PET with absolute myocardial blood flow is most well studied for evaluation of CMD.
Measure absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and stress.
MBF@stress / MBF@rest = CFR
PET with absolute myocardial blood flow is most well studied for evaluation of CMD.
Measure absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and stress.
MBF@stress / MBF@rest = CFR
8/13
Let’s get back to our patient with chest pain, risk factors, and a negative cath.
FIRST, reassess the pre-test prob (PTP) of coronary disease.
Neg LHC & low PTP --> likely true negative
Neg LHC & high PTP --> likely false negative --> dig deeper!
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/3/407/5556137
Let’s get back to our patient with chest pain, risk factors, and a negative cath.
FIRST, reassess the pre-test prob (PTP) of coronary disease.
Neg LHC & low PTP --> likely true negative
Neg LHC & high PTP --> likely false negative --> dig deeper!
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/3/407/5556137
9/13
Despite a negative LHC, our patient still has a significant pre-test prob.
Pearl: women are more likely to have coronary microvascular disease.
So: let's dig deeper for coronary microvascular disease!
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/3/407/5556137
Despite a negative LHC, our patient still has a significant pre-test prob.

So: let's dig deeper for coronary microvascular disease!
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/3/407/5556137
10/13
You get a rest/stress PET and…
…the global CFR is 0.88, far less than the diagnostic threshold of 2.
This can be from any combination of epicardial & microvasc CAD.
But for her, with negative LHC and low CFR, we've diagnosed CMD!
What’s the treatment?
You get a rest/stress PET and…
…the global CFR is 0.88, far less than the diagnostic threshold of 2.
This can be from any combination of epicardial & microvasc CAD.
But for her, with negative LHC and low CFR, we've diagnosed CMD!
What’s the treatment?
11/13
Treatment for CMD is less well defined & challenging due to heterogenous causes!
We need more studies!
Manage risk factors
Aspirin
Statin
Anti-anginals for sx
Rx associated conditions (?infiltrative CM)
Stay tuned for novel therapies
Treatment for CMD is less well defined & challenging due to heterogenous causes!
We need more studies!






12/13
Summary:
LHC misses the majority of coronary vessels
CMD carries an adverse prognosis
You won't know if you won't look
Management remains unclear
Prognosis is NOT benign
Emphasize Prevention: https://www.cardionerds.com/episodes/cardiovascular-prevention/
Summary:






13/13
Here's a mind twister:
If a patient has classic angina with risk factors, a positive stress test, and a negative cath:
Is the stress test a false (+)
Or is the Cath a false (-)?
Don't forget to look for CMD!

If a patient has classic angina with risk factors, a positive stress test, and a negative cath:


Don't forget to look for CMD!