And when we look at the data from the D614G today, we see that the CDC has actually found 50% transmission comes from asymptomatics or presymptomatics.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/more/masking-science-sars-cov2.html

But, now we have a UK strain that is 53-70% more transmissible than the D614G strain dominating now.
screening?

The USA.

Moving on to the study itself.

Good thread here in which they note that 190 of the 300 asymptomatics were actually infected.

https://twitter.com/AAMortazavi/status/1330148630032945164?s=19

So, that means, we had 190 asymptomatic positive cases.

The researchers went on to test all 1174
close contacts of the original 300.

Sounds impressive, until you realize that we don't know how many of the 1174 close contacts were close contacts of the 110 or the 190.

Because the 110 were false positives.

We also have no idea of the behaviors of those close contacts.
Having just gone through a firestorm of a pandemic, were they wearing masks even with close contacts?

When people are made aware of the true dangers of any situation, their compliance with safety measures goes up drastically.

Much more so in a country that emphasizes utter
obedience to their government.

In this study, they went on to suggest that CoVid is weakening.

The prevalence of the D614G strain (everywhere), clearly shows that this is not true.

To conclude...let's not base public policy on studies and data that are no longer applicable.
You can follow @LazarusLong13.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.