Read on Twitter
Ten philosophy papers in no particular order. Only rules: I really enjoyed it & it came out this year. Could easily have picked dozens of others. Whatever is sometimes said about the state of the field, there is a lot of great work being done out there. 
#1 Ema Sullivan-Bissett @Ema_SB. Unimpaired abduction to alien abduction: lessons on delusion formation. Fascinating discussion of alien abduction beliefs and what they reveal about the unappreciated power of one-factor accounts of delusions. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09515089.2020.1765324 /2
#2 Andrew Bacon. Inductive Knowledge. Characteristically crystal clear and illuminating discussion of the surprising commitments one has to choose between to secure inductive knowledge. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nous.12266 /3
#3 Ali Boyle @aliboyle6. Conjoined twinning & biological individuation. Deftly-handled and deeply-informed discussion of how the animalist should handle different cases of conjoined twinning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01316-x /4
#4 Matthew Mandelkern @MMandelkern. Practical Moore Sentences. You must read this paper, though I donât know whether you will! https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nous.12287 /5
P.S. If youâre into Moore, I'd also strongly recommend Frank Hongâs really fun discussion of acceptable Moore sentences in Uttering Moorean Sentences and the pragmatics of belief reports https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-020-01514-y /6
#5 EJ Green. The Perception-Cognition Border: A Case for Architectural Division. When I thought there was nothing new to say on the issue, a compelling new dimension restriction hypothesis for distinguishing perceptual and cognitive processes. Superb. https://read.dukeupress.edu/the-philosophical-review/article-abstract/129/3/323/166790/The-Perception-Cognition-Border-A-Case-for /7
#6 Julia Jael Smith. Unacknowledged Permissivism. A clever and original way of reconciling persmissivism with objections: persmissivism is true but you canât ever rationally believe you are in a permissive case. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papq.12299 /8
#7 Will Davies. Colour Relations in Form. Think you need to see colours to be able to see colour relations? Think again. Brilliantly well worked out and compelling position. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phpr.12679 /9
#8 Ben HolguĂn. Lying and knowing. In asserting that p, you lie just if you know that p is false. Trenchantly argued and methodologically sophisticated defense of a simple but snubbed view. https://philpapers.org/rec/HOLLAK-3 /10
#9 Umrao Sethi @umraosethi. Sensible Over-Determination. How to be a naĂŻve realist and a sense-datum theorist at the same time!? Very cool to see a new position worked out like this. https://academic.oup.com/pq/article-abstract/70/280/588/5631763 /11
#10 @jorgemlg, Axel Baz and @chazfirestone. Sustained representation of perspectival shape. Beautiful â literally, look at their figures! â mix of philosophy & exp ingenuity, casting new light on a time-old puzzle about perspectival representation. https://www.pnas.org/content/117/26/14873 /END
