Last night, I tweeted about photography & consent. Should people have a right to say No to the camera?
I'm far from the only person asking this question. Here's a short thread with links to recent writing that my students & I have found to be useful & challenging. https://twitter.com/johnedwinmason/status/1343717619157905410
Five very short, related essays by @AishaAriella are a good introduction to how she's transforming our understanding the history of photography. For her, photography can't be separated from the powerful interests that it so often served. https://www.fotomuseum.ch/en/explore/still-searching/articles/155239_unlearning_the_origins_of_photography
Azoulay < @AishaAriella> argues that photographers' connections to elites -- political, commercial, cultural -- granted them the "right" to take photos of the colonized, the marginalized, the poor, & the oppressed, while giving the "subjects" of their images no rights at all.
A big thank you to Laura for bringing these resources to my attention. https://twitter.com/_LSaunders_/status/1343937321331265540?s=20
If someone asked, "What topics in photo history need to be explored?" I might say, "Resistance to photography." As some have pointed out, resistance has always been there, but photographers usually edit it out. Happily archives sometimes show it to us. (Marjory Collins/FSA, 1942)
You can follow @johnedwinmason.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.