Read on Twitter
The civil case was away for me to document what they were doing and get things on the record. RR DOJ/FBI, had wired the attorney client Booth so they could hear everything. Illegal surveillance just like they were doing to everyone else.
James Bredar, the exact same judge in my criminal case, this civil case, and the case against the BGF gang, ruled on all three cases.
JUDGE BREDAR acknowledged in my criminal case that illegal surveillance was rampant, and sealed it.
JUDGE BREDAR acknowledged in my criminal case that illegal surveillance was rampant, and sealed it.
In the civil case same judge same opposing council PJ Martinez for all three cases, judge Bredar, denied the illegal surveillance and threw the case out.
In the criminal case against the black guerilla family gang.
Same George same PJ Martinez.
Fault to include illegally recorded conversations so they could prosecute gang members it was the only evidence they had against them.
Same George same PJ Martinez.
Fault to include illegally recorded conversations so they could prosecute gang members it was the only evidence they had against them.
PJ Martinez, on the record threatening me threatening my wife. He's the one who said they were going to kill my wife then came back and told me they killed Molly instead.
In one case he admits it and says what are you going to do?
( About illegal surveillance etc)
Sealed
In one case he admits it and says what are you going to do?
( About illegal surveillance etc)
Sealed
In my civil case he denies it ever happened. Then in the bgf case he fights to have it admitted into evidence. Same judge same courtroom same PJ Martinez. This is how they do their normal business anything they want you are always wrong you are guilty.
Basically everyone I worked for, individuals, the agencies are listed elsewhere 
The BGF gang case they used the illegal recordings in.
