Last week the @DOJ_EOIR quietly updated its list of "Myths vs. Fact." I haven't factchecked the new one, but it's much longer and at first glance appears to even more misleading than the previous one. https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1161001/download
Also, EOIR uploaded the new one at the same URL as the prior one, which effectively removes the prior one from the internet. I've saved a copy of the old one here: https://www.hoppocklawfirm.com/myth_vs_fact_05082019/
Retired Immigration Judges and former BIA members also spoke out in May, 2019 about how wildly inaccurate the document was. https://www.aila.org/infonet/retired-ijs-and-former-members-of-the-bia-object
Later, a FOIA request for something else turned up these notes from a Senior OCIJ meeting confirming the Office of Chief Immigration Judge wasn't consulted and "did not support" the document. https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/07/22/07072020Untitled_Redacted.pdf
I posted a fact-check of the prior version here, also showing the EOIR director McHenry himself had authored the document circulated afterward that tried to explain it. https://twitter.com/MatthewHoppock/status/1286264532520886273?s=20
Lol at this snippet. This ignores that the OIG found quite the opposite re the appointment of, for example, current Deputy Chief Appellate Immigration Judge Garry Malphrus here: https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/special/s0807/final.pdf
I mean
This little update to the section on VTC makes it appear that in 2020 EOIR had quite an increase in hearings continued due to video malfunction. Compare 2019 to 2020:
You can follow @MatthewHoppock.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.