Read on Twitter
A shabby attempt by OP. Ministry of Minority Affairs makes these annual reports by clubbing all the actions it has implemented "already" (meaning those taken by previous governments) as well as the actions taken in present times (which in the BJP Rule has mainly been edu funds). https://twitter.com/_ShahHarsh/status/1341680514843832325
These don't give any clue about current progress but only indicate whether recommendations of Sachar Committee have/have not been implemented in any period. For eg, this is MoMA Report 13-14 indicating the M Personnel guidelines (INC~Status: Implemented) ! https://bit.ly/34GWcfi
This is from the same report (again the status of these recommendations is implemented; also implementation has been done even before the year 2013-14!! I have simply picked up this one for ref purpose) on Financial schemes, Madarssa status etc.
Link of report above (from Pg13)
Link of report above (from Pg13)
Again picking the 2012-13 MoMA Report proudly proclaiming the "IMPLEMENTED" status of said schemes :)
You seriously need to find a better source to claim & consistently prove that the practice has seeped into the current ruling govt while it is just a data collection exercise.
You seriously need to find a better source to claim & consistently prove that the practice has seeped into the current ruling govt while it is just a data collection exercise.
I've made my point. You may access reports stretching even back to MoMA creation year at http://www.minorityaffairs.gov.in/reports/annual-reports
Also misdirected outrage is not nice & erodes your credibility. We must instead demand answers from BJP about increased finances as that's only where it's at fault.
Also misdirected outrage is not nice & erodes your credibility. We must instead demand answers from BJP about increased finances as that's only where it's at fault.
I at a personal & social level am vociferously against increasing dispersal of such funds (Can understand that it's needed to a degree due to narrative/lobby/some deep state management but they must limit the spend). That's what v must criticise but not via shields of falsehoods.
