The funniest bloke on this platform has been banished.

What many don’t know is that all of our accounts have a score. The more you are blocked, reported or use certain phrases associated with conservative politics, the more likely you are to be banished.
Of course, leftists and liberal pussies are far more likely to block and report their opponents. (A study was done on this and found that Democrat voters and leftist agitators are *far* more likely to block/report than conservatives, who regard not behaving in that way...
...as a matter of principle.)

The algorithm is also tilted to recognise conservative speech-patterns and common phrases - ideas which the blue-haired big-tech activists regard as dangerous: “MAGA”; “stop the steal” &&&.

The algorithm on this thing *hunts* those accounts.
And the @Twitter authoritarians will even “shadow ban” them: turn down the volume on the account so that nobody can see what it’s tweeting. The user keeps tweeting and wonders why he/she is haemorrhaging followers and nobody is replying. It’s because Twitter has decided...
...that you must be silenced but does not want to draw attention to its own intrigue by outright banning you (and thousands of other conservative activists like you).

@TwitterSupport, any comments on this malpractice. You’re quite content with this type of censorship.
Anyway, that’s how Twitter attempts to maintain deniability for its mass censorship of right-of-centre politics.

YouTube and Google maintain deniability by relegating certain websites and videos to the back pages of its search results. It has blacklists, effectively...
...shadow-banning certain accounts and websites.

Their algorithms are also tilted to favour mainstream, left-of-centre news sources. The first results you see on any Google search for a controversial topic have been effectively filtered by a political activist.
News sites like @BreitbartNews are relegated to the back pages on the absurd pretext that they spread “fake news” and “conspiracy theories”. Only the “authoritative” news sources are shown up front - news sources which just happen to be left-leaning outlets like CNN and the...
...Huffington Post.

There are many other dodgy, fascistic practices going but but these ☝️ are the principal means by which Big Tech maintains a stranglehold on the political narrative. And Washington is awash with Big Tech’s lobby dollars, which is why regulation has fallen...
...flat so far. Even conservative political groups argue that regulation is an infringement on free enterprise and corporate rights. Unsurprisingly, those groups are also on the Big Tech payroll.

Regulation of Big Tech is like regulation of anything else - in finance; trading...
...standards; aviation safety etc - in that it exists to provide the individual with legal recourse in the common law against the immensity of corporate power and greed.

That ☝️ is a fundamental conservative principle. Conservatism has always sought to protect the...
...individual human, his property and his labour against the forces of political and corporate/industrial power.

Leftwingers are on the side of Big Tech. A principled conservative is not, and seeks to break its power in favour of the individual’s freedoms and rights.
If you’re interested, I’d recommend this book by @LibertarianBlue.

A fascinating read, which charts how the dream of a free and decentralised internet gave way to an authoritarian corporate nightmare.
You can follow @TheAlbertFlash.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.