Remember EO 13950, relating to the use of certain diversity & inclusion training topics by federal agencies, contractors & grantees, and the Armed Services? An update: sections of the EO relating to contractors & grantees were enjoined nationwide by the N. District of California.
The court found that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the arguments that the EO impermissibly chilled their constitutionally protected speech based on content & viewpoint . . .
. . . and that it violates their Due Process rights and is unconstitutionally vague because it provides “inadequate notice of the conduct it purports to prohibit.”
To read the decision: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20436798/12-22-20-santa-cruz-lesbian-and-gay-cc-v-trump-order.pdf
And for more on EO 13950: https://system.suny.edu/sci/news/10-3-20-eo-on-combating-race-and-sex-stereotyping/index.html
You can follow @SUNYSCI.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.