1/8

If you are a casual observer and are a bit unclear why the $XRP case is worse for Ripple than cases against $EOS, $KIN and others were, here is a quick summary:
2/8

1. Unlike Kin and EOS, where the SEC alleged the securities violations were just at the point of sale, the SEC is alleging here that $XRP is *STILL* in violation of securities law present day.

That means they believe it is currently a security, hence the exchange reactions.
3/8

2. They've got multiple document points of proof of centralization, acknowledgement of securities issues, and selling practices in writing.

There is no room to plead ignorance/stupidity here.
4/8

3. They've personally named the executives as liable, which the SEC does when they go for a kill shot. This is much more common in fraud action than general securities action.
5/8

4. There is an American entity at fault falling solely under SEC jurisdiction. No questions about it.
6/8

EOS got lucky with a settlement, ambiguity and the fact it was no longer found to be a security. Same with Kin.

Projects like Unikoin Gold however were dealt fatal blows.

The shot the SEC lined up here is way worse.
7/8

Exchanges that aren't broker-dealers and have any US exposure at all now need to delist $XRP until the case is settled.

Same with purchasing agents, trade desks and funds. It's death by a thousand cuts.
8/8

And this case will likely drag out for 2+ years before there is clarity.

Crypto projects have a chance to settle and resolve if the SEC thinks they were only previously centralized.

Centralized payment databases have no path to safety.
You can follow @AdamScochran.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.