More sad fun over Spain's serologic survey 4th round.

Now we can compare the PCR/IgG results thru crisis. One should expect them to follow a ~constant proportion, reflecting the PCR false positives ratio, specially at abusive Ct value, not human dependent.

Of course they don't.
If we check values for older than 2 weeks PCR+, time for IgG to develope, we observe a constant decrease round after round in PCR reliability: 88%, 76%, 74% 62%~67%.

The shift in testing really sick people, with chance of the virus, to widespread random universe is to blame.
It doesn't stop the fear narrative to accept this obvious fake results, and just keep admitting the PCR results AS the epidemic, which blatantly wasn't, as all the other side facts proved.

Thus the 2nd wave is not only the absurd human artifact I've explained, but 1/3 pure fake.
The sad thing, under the wall of lies, epidemic follows its path, and we really missed what went on underneath with true epidemic.

A seasonal small autumn wave had gone NON studied, as covered in tons of human tricking.

The lack of even curiosity for truth is so disgusting!
More.

4th round also hits another CV mantra. Shelter at home is dancing your life.

Among those groups:
Never almost never leaves home
1-3 days a week
4-7 days week

Guess which one gets MORE infected.

Yes, bingo.
Those with the LESSER mobility, trying to never leave shelter.
Again, as with masks, another brick in the proof of what we already knew when science wasn't scholastics.

We never quarantined the healthy because IT WASN'T MODERN SCIENCE, just magic thought. It's not only extremely harming, but proved, at least, useless.
More incoherence.

Seroconversion reflects the real percentage detected as new infected between rounds.

From round 1 to 3, restrictions were constantly released: LESS restrictions leaded to incoherent LESS infections

Seasonality's to blame, & yes, that descend was WITHOUT masks
Last one for today.

The proportion of 'suspicious' thru compatible symptoms is such a joke.

Those with FIVE compatible symptoms are 85% NON covid, percentages way over 90% for lesser symptoms, and less than the half of the so called super CV specific anosmia.
This, of course is not preventing the unbelievable 'suspicious curve' to show on official reports, as it meant anything.

It's a good 90% PURE FAKE.

It is (blue) already as big as cases (green)!

What in hell is the meaning or scientifical use of suspicious?!!!
And, while we draw that huge curve we KNOW is 90% fake, those people REALLY have symptoms. So they're really sick.

They COUNT officially in that covid suspicious table, that they aren't, and we WONDER where can the flu be!

Behold its magical vanishing in green spikes.
Maybe miraculously we've win our millennial struggle with flu. Ever since we're humans it is with us, but now we accept ZERO flu, and search for the weirdest explanations

There's 90% CV (&flu!) compatible symptoms noted under covid that ARE NOT covid

Maybe, just maybe, it's flu
You can follow @plaforscience.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.